Open Access
Original Research Article
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 28, Number 2, 2022
Article Number 16
Number of page(s) 7
Published online 08 April 2022
  1. Ylikontiola L, Kinnunen J, Oikarinen, K. Factors affecting neurosensory disturbance after mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:1234–1239. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Trauner R, Obwegeser, H. The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. I. Surgical procedures to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1957;10:677–689. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eguchi T, Takato T, Mori Y, Yoda T, Koizumi T, Tsuyama Y, et al. Clinical study of mental nerve paralysis after sagittal split of ramus osteotomy of mandible. Japanese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2005;48:137–143. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yamamoto R, Nakamura A, Ohno K, Michi, K. Relationship of the mandibular canal to the lateral cortex of the mandibular ramus as a factor in the development of neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:490–495. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim S-G, Park S-S. Incidence of complications and problems related to orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:2438–2444. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Panula K, Finne K, Oikarinen, K. Incidence of complications and problems related to orthognathic surgery: a review of 655 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:1128–1136. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Westermark A, Bystedt H, von Konow L. Inferior alveolar nerve function after mandibular osteotomies. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;36:425–428. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Westermark A, Bystedt H, von Konow L. Inferior alveolar nerve function after sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible: correlation with degree of intraoperative nerve encounter and other variables in 496 operations. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;36:429–433. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Marmulla R, Niederdellmann, H. Surgical planning of computer-assisted repositioning osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:938–944. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Siessegger M, Mischkowski RA, Schneider BT, Krug B, Klesper B, Zöller, JE. Image guided surgical navigation for removal of foreign bodies in the head and neck. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001;29:321–325. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Wagner A, Enislidis, G. Computer-guided flapless placement and immediate loading of four conical screw-type implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:534–539. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Schicho K, Gigovic N, Turhani, D., Enislidis, G. Computer-guided flapless transmucosal implant placement in the mandible: a new combination of two innovative techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:718–723. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Levine MH, Goddard AL, Dodson, TB. Inferior Alveolar Nerve Canal Position: A Clinical and Radiographic Study. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2007;65:470–474. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Angelopoulos C, Thomas S, Hechler S, Parissis N, Hlavacek, M. Comparison Between Digital Panoramic Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for the Identification of the MandibularCanalasPartofPresurgicalDentalImplantAssessment. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2008;66:2130–2135. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hogan G, Ellis, E. The “Antilingula”—Fact or Fiction? Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2006;64:1248–1254. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hunsuck, EE. A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technic for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Surg 1968;26:250–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Monnazzi MS, Passeri LA, Gabrielli MFR, Bolini PDA, de Carvalho WRS, da Costa Machado H. Anatomic study of the mandibular foramen, lingula and antilingula in dry mandibles, and its statistical relationship between the true lingula and the antilingula. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:74–78. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fernandes, AC de S, Fraga, T de Le, Trindade, Neto AI, Freitas, AC de. Delimitação morfométrica para o corte horizontal da osteotomia sagital no ramo da mandíbula. Rev cir traumatol buco-maxilo-fac 2009;107–114. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kositbowornchai S, Siritapetawee M, Damrongrungruang T, Khongkankong W, Chatrchaiwiwatana S, Khamanarong K, et al. Shape of the lingula and its localization by panoramic radiograph versus dry mandibular measurement. Surg Radiol Anat 2007;29:689–694. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Balcioglu HA, Kilic C, Varol A, Ozan H, Kocabiyik N, Yildirim, M. A Morphometric Study of the Maxillary Artery and Lingula in Relation to Mandibular Ramus Osteotomies and TMJ Surgery. Eur J Dent 2010;4:166–170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jansisyanont P, Apinhasmit W, Chompoopong, S. Shape, height, and location of the lingula for sagittal ramus osteotomy in Thais. Clinical Anatomy 2009;22:787–793. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chenna D, Hosapatna M, D’Souza, AS, Gadicherla, S., Pentapati, KC. Lingula and Antilingula as Anatomic Reference Points for Ramus Osteotomies. International Journal of Dental Sciences and Research 2015;3:1–3. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lima FJC, Oliveira Neto OB, Barbosa FT, Sousa-Rodrigues, CF. Location, shape and anatomic relations of the mandibular foramen and the mandibular lingula: a contribution to surgical procedures in the ramus of the mandible. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;20:177–182. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Akcay H, Kalabalik F, Tatar B, Ulu, M. Location of the mandibular lingula: Comparison of skeletal Class I and Class III patients in relation to ramus osteotomy using cone-beam computed tomography. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;120:504–508. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhao K, Zhang B, Hou Y, Miao L, Wang R, Yuan, H. Imaging study on relationship between the location of lingula and the Gonial angle in a Chinese population. Surg Radiol Anat 2019;41: 455–460. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Balaji SM, Krishnaswamy NR, Kumar SM, Rooban, T. Inferior alveolar nerve canal position among South Indians: A cone beam computed tomographic pilot study. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery 2012;2:51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ozturk A, Potluri A, Vieira, A. Position and course of the mandibular canal in skulls. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology 2012;113:453–458. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee HE, Han, SJ. Anatomical position of the mandibular canal in relation to the buccal cortical bone: relevance to sagittal split osteotomy. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;44:167–173. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. HA-M, HA-A, BA-K, BA-J, SS. Determination of the position of mentalforamen and frequency of anterior loop in Saudi population. A retrospective CBCT study. Saudi Dent J 2017;29:29–35. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang L, Zheng, Q. Anatomic Relationship between Mental Foramen and Peripheral Structures Observed By Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Anat Physiol 2015;05. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.