Open Access
Med Buccale Chir Buccale
Volume 22, Number 3, Juillet 2016
Page(s) 185 - 192
Section Article original / Original article
Published online 07 December 2016
  1. Chang SH, Lin CL, Hsue SS, Lin YS, Huang SR. Short implants placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla. Medical Engineering & Physics 2012;34:153-160. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Malevez C. Le concept de l’ancrage zygomatique dans l’édentation totale. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2012;113(4):299-306. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Daculsi G, Malard O, Goyenvalle E. Efficacité et performance des substituts osseux pour remplacer les allogreffes et autogreffes. ITBM-RBM 2005;26:218-22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kolk A, Handschel J, Drescher W, Rothamel D, Kloss F, Blessmann M, Heiland M, Wolff KD, Smeets R. Current trends and future perspectives of bone substitute materials from space holders to innovative biomaterials. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 2012;40:706-718. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Riben C, Thor A. The Maxillary Sinus Membrane Elevation Procedure: Augmentation of Bone around Dental Implants without Grafts – A Review of a Surgical Technique. Int J Dent 2012;105-483. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chavrier C, Perriat M. Les augmentations osseuses maxillaires postérieures par comblement sous-sinusien. Implantodontie 2005;14:27-42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Thiéry G, Coulet O, Adam S, Lari N. Greffe de comblement sous sinusien par os autologue : technique chirurgicale. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2008;109(6):379-382. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ben Slama L. Greffes osseuses autologues, allogreffes et biomatériaux. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2005;106(3):133-135. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Seban A, Deboise A, Bonnaud P. Insuffisance osseuse verticale circonscrite de la région maxillaire postérieure corrigée par un comblement sinusien alloplastique pour un traitement implantaire. Implantodontie 2005;14:186-190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chai F, Raoul G, Wiss A, Ferri J, Hildebrand HF. Les biomatériaux de substitution osseuse : classification et intérêt. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2011;112 :212-221. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schaaf H, Streckbein P, Lendeckel S, Heidinger KS, Rehmann P, Boedeker RH, Howaldt HP. Sinus lift augmentation using autogenous bone grafts and platelet-rich plasma: radiographic results. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 106:673-678. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark P. A 15 years study of osseo-integrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Benke D, Olah A, Mohler H. Protein-chemical analysis of Bio-Oss bone substitute and evidence on its carbonate content. Biomaterials 2001;22:1005-1012. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sakka S, Krenkel C. Simultaneous maxillary sinus lifting and implant placement with autogenous parietal bone graft: Outcome of 17 cases. J Carniomaxillofac Surg 2011;39(3):187-191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Martinez H, Davarpanah M. Choix raisonné de la chronologie thérapeutique en implantologie. Implantodontie 2003;12:187-191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee HW. A retrospective study of complications associated with 100 consecutive maxillary sinus augmentations via the lateral window approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28(3): 860-868. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bhattacharyya N. Bilateral chronic maxillary sinusitis after the sinus-lift procedure. Am J Otolaryngol 1999;20:133-135. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tawil G, Mawla M. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss®) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayered collagen barrier (Bio-Gide®): a clinical report of immediate and delayed implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:713-721. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gehrke SA, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Corbella S. Repair of a perforated sinus membrane with a subepithelial palatal conjunctive flap: technique report and evaluation. Int J Dent 2012;489762. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sullivan SM, Bulard RA, Meaders R, Patterson MK. The use of fibrin adhesive in sinus lift procedures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;84:616-619. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Baccar MN, Laure B, Chabut A, Bonin B, Romieux G, Goga D. Stabilité du greffon et des implants après greffe osseuse du sinus maxillaire. Étude rétrospective de 44 cas. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2005;106:153-156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rosano G, Taschieri S, Gaudy JF, Weinstein T, Del Fabbro M. Maxillary sinus vascular anatomy and its relation to sinus lift surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22(7);711-715. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Meyer C, Chatelain B, Benarroch M, Garnier JF, Ricbourg B, Camponovo T. Greffes sinusiennes massives par phosphate tricalcique : Résultats à long terme. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2009;110:69-76. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ihde SKA, Konstantinovic VS. Comparaison et définition des phénomènes pathologiques péri-implantaires et des étapes thérapeutiques possibles impliquant des implants basaux et crestaux. Implantodontie 2005;176-185. [Google Scholar]
  25. Blomqvist JE, Alberius P, Isaksson S, Linde A, Hansso BG. Factors in implant integration failure after bone grafting. An osteometric and endocrinologic matched analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;25:63-68. [Google Scholar]
  26. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Lacono VJ. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:11-45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:565-577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Perrin D, Ahossi V, Larras P, Lafon A, Gérard E, Editors. Manuel de chirurgie orale. éd CdP, Paris, 2012. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.