Open Access
Med Buccale Chir Buccale
Volume 21, Number 4, octobre 2015
Page(s) 243 - 247
Section Note technique / Technical note
Published online 25 September 2015
  1. Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2014;93:950-958. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, et al. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 2003;74:990-999. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Iyer S, Haribabu PK, Xing Y. Part II. Minimizing alveolar bone loss during and after extractions. Protocol and techniques for alveolar bone preservation. Alpha Omegan 2014;107:14-25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kim YK, Yun PY, Um IW, Lee HJ, Yi YJ, Bae JH, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation of an extraction socket using autogenous tooth bone graft material for implant site development: prospective case series. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:521-527. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Verdugo F, D’Addona A, Pontón J. Clinical, tomographic, and histological assessment of periosteal guided bone regeneration with cortical perforations in advanced human critical size defects. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:112-120. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. De Monès E, Schlaubitz S, Catros S, Fricain JC. Statins and alveolar bone resorption: a narrative review of preclinical and clinical studies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015;119:65-73. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Luque-Martín E, Tobella-Camps ML, Rivera-Baró A. Alveolar graft in the cleft lip and palate patient: review of 104 cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014;19:e531-537. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Khoury F, Hensher R. The bony lid approach for the apical root resection of lower molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 16:166-170. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Khoury F. The bony lid approach in pre-implant and implant surgery: a prospective study. Eur J Oral Implantol 2013;6:375-384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Labanca M, Azzola F, Vinci R, Rodella LF. Piezoelectric surgery: twenty years of use. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;46:265-269. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rullo R, Addabbo F, Papaccio G, D’Aquino R, Festa VM. Piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments in impacted third molar surgery: relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain with histological evaluations. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2013;41:e33-38. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kocyigit ID, Atil F, Alp YE, Tekin U, Tuz HH. Piezosurgery versus conventional surgery in radicular cyst enucleation. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:1805-1808. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yaman Z, Suer BT. Clinical comparison of ultrasonic surgery and conventional surgical techniques for enucleating jaw cysts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;42:1462-1468. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pappalardo S, Guarnieri R. Randomized clinical study comparing piezosurgery and conventional rotatory surgery in mandibular cyst enucleation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014;42:e80-85. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chiapasco M, Rossi A, Motta JJ, Crescentini M. Spontaneous bone regeneration after enucleation of large mandibular cysts: a radiographic computed analysis of 27 consecutive cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:942-948; discussion 949. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ihan Hren N, Miljavec M. Spontaneous bone healing of the large bone defects in the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:1111-1116. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ettl T, Gosau M, Sader R, Reichert TE. Jaw cysts - filling or no filling after enucleation? A review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012;40:485-493. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.