Open Access
Issue
Med Buccale Chir Buccale
Volume 20, Number 4, Octobre 2014
Page(s) 269 - 273
Section Cas clinique et revue de littérature / Up-to date Review and Case Report
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2014029
Published online 24 December 2014
  1. Antic M, Lautenschlager S, Itin PH. Eosinophilic fasciitis 30 years after - what do we really know? Report of 11 patients and review of the literature. Dermatology 2006;213:93-101. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Peterson LS, Nelson AM, Su WP. Classification of morphea (localized scleroderma). Mayo Clin Proc 1995;70:1068-76. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Laxer RM, Zulian F. Localized scleroderma. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2006;18:606-13. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bischoff L, Derk CT. Eosinophilic fasciitis : demographics, disease pattern and response to treatment : report of 12 cases and review of the literature. Int J Dermatol 2008;47:29-35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Shulman LE. Diffuse fasciitis with hypergammaglobulinemia and eosinophilia: a new syndrome? J Rheumatol 1974;1:46. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lebeaux D, Francès C, Barete S, Wechsler B, Dubourg O, Renoux J, et al. Eosinophilic fasciitis (Shulman disease): new insights into the therapeutic management from a series of 34 patients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012;51:557-61. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lebeaux D, Sène D. Eosinophilic fasciitis (Shulman disease). Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2012;26:449-58. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Naoui A, Bouslama K, Abdallah M, Hamzaoui S, Arbi T, Bahri F, et al. Eosinophilic fasciitis (Shulman’s disease): a case series of 11 patients. Rev Med Interne 2010;31:535-39. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lakhanpal S, Ginsburg WW, Michet CJ, Doyle JA, Moore SB. Eosinophilic fasciitis: clinical spectrum and therapeutic response in 52 cases. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1988;17:221-31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Endo Y, Tamura A, Matsushima Y, Iwasaki T, Hasegawa M, Nagai Y, Ishikawa O. Eosinophilic fasciitis : report of two cases and a systematic review of the literature dealing with clinical variables that predict outcome. Clin Rheumatol 2007;26:1445-51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Desvignes-Engelbert A, Saulière N, Loeuille D, Blum A, Chary-Valckenaere I. From diagnosis to remission: place of MRI in eosinophilic fasciitis. Clin Rheumatol 2010;29:1461-64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moulton SJ, Kransdorf MJ, Ginsburg WW, Abril A, Persellin S. Eosinophilic fasciitis: spectrum of MRI findings. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:975-78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheriet S, Chastan M, Levesque H, Marie I. Positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of eosinophilic fasciitis. QJM 2011;104:987-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kissin EY, Garg A, Grayson PC, Dubreuil M, Vradii D, York M, Simms RW. Ultrasound assessment of subcutaneous compressibility : a potential adjunctive diagnostic tool in eosinophilic fasciitis. J Clin Rheumatol 2013;19:382-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Joassin R, Donnay M, Hugé J, Brasseur JP. Functional assessment and rehabilitation of eosinophilic fasciitis. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2006;49:577-80. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Service de rééducation de l’hôpital Cochin Paris en partenariat avec l’Association des sclérodermiques de France (ASF) et le Groupe français de recherche sur la sclérodermie (GFRCS). CD-ROM Sclérodermie : Programme d’exercices kinésithérapiques. AP-HP, Université de Paris Descartes. [Google Scholar]
  17. Haute autorité de santé (HAS). Avis du 29 novembre 2011, TheraBite, dispositif de réhabilitation de la mobilité mandibulaire. http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/2011-12/therabite-29_novembre_2011_4060_ avis.pdf (consulté le 2 juillet 2014). [Google Scholar]
  18. Haddad H, Sundaram S, Magro C, Gergis U. Eosinophilic fasciitis as a paraneoplastic syndrome, a case report and review of the literature. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther 2014;7:90-92. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.