EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 29 / No 1 (2023) J Oral Med Oral Surg, 29 1 (2023) 8 Full HTML
Open Access
Issue
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 29, Number 1, 2023
Article Number 8
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2023001
Published online 03 February 2023

© The authors, 2023

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Inflammatory pain is one of the most prevalent clinical complaints, and it affects anywhere from 25.35% to 50.75% of individuals in the major European countries [1–4]. The bulk of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) makes up the therapeutic alternatives currently available for pain accompanied by inflammation. On the other hand, the use of NSAIDs for an extended time is linked with an increased possibility of gastrointestinal bleeding, acute renal injury, and heart problems [5]. Therefore, it is essential to research and develop new medications that are both safe and capable of relieving inflammatory pain. Lidocaine is an amide local anesthetic medical agent broadly used in dental maneuvers. Because these medications reduce sodium ion permeability and aid in minimizing membrane depolarization, they cure pain by limiting neuronal transmission [6,7]. Repair and regenerative activities begin immediately after the damage occurs. Proliferation, modification of mediators and extracellular matrix, and circulatory blood cells are all initiated by different growth factors [8]. Inflammation, immune mechanisms, and cell-to-cell communication are all influenced by cytokines. Several stimuli, including trauma and inflammation, trigger the production of interleukins and Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [9,10]. TNF-α, an inflammatory cytokine, and collagen synthesis are responsible for a wide range of cellular signaling activities and play a crucial part in wound healing specifically in the acute stage of inflammation. TNF-α also plays a role in regulating the immune system [11]. Besides being a local anesthetic agent lidocaine is considered a promising anti-inflammatory agent yet limited studies on its effect on mucous epithelium are available in the literature [12,13]. To the best of our knowledge, no experimental studies investigating the anti-inflammatory effect of lidocaine intraoral has not been previously reported. Therefore, the current study was conducted on rabbits to establish a rabbit model of inflammation. This study aimed to clarify the role of lidocaine gel against inflammation via examining the histological and immunohistochemical expression of TNF-α in the oral mucosa after induction wound by surgery in rabbits.

Materials and methods

This experiment observed animal functions according to the National Institutional Health Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 85-23, revised 1985). The ethical committee accepted the study after measuring ethical criteria at all stages of performing operations and handling animals [Approval letter No. UOM.Dent/A.L.85/21]. Thirty-two healthy albino male rabbits, whose weight was about 2 ± 0.5 kg, were purchased from the animal house, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul. Animals were housed in convenient animal circumstances, with ten rabbits per cage. Food and water were ad libtium with exposure to 12 hours' light–dark cycle, adequate ventilation, and a temperature of 22–25 °C.

Study design and surgical procedure

According to the study materials, this was a single-blinded randomized trial in which animals were divided into two groups of 16 rabbits each on a random basis: Group A had a 1 cm intra-oral mucosal buccal incision on the right side that was left untreated. In contrast, Group B had a 1 cm intra-oral mucosal buccal incision on the left side that was treated with lidocaine gel 5%. (LidoGel, China). For anesthesia, each animal received an intramuscular injection of ketamine hydrochloride 4 mg/kg in 50 mg/ml (Gracure Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bhiwadi, India) and xylazine base 5 mg/kg in 20 mg/ml (Interchemi Co, Holland) in the thigh muscle. The anesthesia integrity was tested after 10–15 min by loss of ear pinch reflex. About 1 cm intra-oral mucosal buccal incision was operated on each side of the buccal mucosa of the cheek of rabbits intra-orally with a surgical blade no. 15. For standardization, the amount of gel was measured by a disposable syringe (1 ml).

Collection of specimens and scoring

Depending on the time of sacrifice, the animals in each group were separated into four subgroups, each of 4 rabbits; G1: Day 1 post-surgery; G2: Day 3 post-surgery; G3: Day 7 post-surgery; G4: Day10 post-surgery.

Tissue preparation for histological study and immunohistochemistry analysis

Following euthanization of rabbits, the selected site of study of buccal mucosa was fixed for histological examination and was observed under a light microscope using a scoring system recorded by many authors with minor modifications [14,15]. All collected data were subjected to statistical analysis and the percentage of nuclear and cytoplasmic expression in the connective tissue is allocated into four scores [16,17]: 0: no positive cells; 1 Mild: Positive cells in a percentage of 1–33%. 2 Moderate: Positive cells in a percentage of 34–66%. 3 Intense: Positive cells in a percentage of 67–100%.

Statistical analysis

Collected data underwent statistical analysis using “Statistical Package for Social Statistics” (SPSS) version 25 for Windows software. The “Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test” was used to assess histologic and immunohistochemical alteration between the two groups. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.

Results

Histological assessment

The differences between the control and treatment groups regarding inflammatory reactions at a given time interval of healing are shown in Table I.

The impact of the use of lidocaine used in this study was noticed on day one and continued up to 10 days as revealed by a statistical significance in Wilcoxon Signed Ranks. Although the inflammatory reaction on days 1, 3, 7 and 10 appeared to have a higher importance in which P-value (0.063, 0.063, 0.038, 0.038), respectively, the healing process and reepithelization were more rapid and convenient in the treatment group when compared with the control group as shown in Figure 1.

Table I

p-values of Wilcoxon signed ranks test for histopathological readings.

thumbnail Fig. 1

Photomicrographs of rabbit oral mucosa for histopathological examination. A1&2: Control and treatment group respectively at one-day interval reveals heavy infiltration of inflammatory cells. B1&2: Control and treatment group respectively at three-day interval reveals slightly decrease of inflammation in treatment group compared to control group. C1&2; D1&2: Control and treatment group at seven-day interval and control and treatment group at 10-day interval respectively show superior healing process and decreasing of inflammatory reaction and formation of granulation tissue more regular than control group. H&E stain, 100×, 400×.

Immunohistochemical assessment

The expression of TNF-α via immunostaining was conducted in this work to clarify the cytoplasmic alterations in this marker produced by connective tissue cells throughout the healing periods among rabbits from day one to day 10 with and without lidocaine, as shown in Table II. TNF-α started to express clearly at one day and gradually decreased and disappeared at 10 days with a superior effect of the lidocaine group over the control group as shown in Figure 2.

Table II

p-values of Wilcoxon signed ranks test for immunohistochemical readings.

thumbnail Fig. 2

Photomicrographs of rabbit oral mucosa for immunohistochemical examination of TNF-α. C1: Heavy expression of TNF-α (arrows) in control group compared to (T1) treatment group at one-day interval reveals heavy infiltration of inflammatory cells. C3: TNF-α also continue to express in control group, while reduced in treatment group (arrows) (T3) at three-day interval. C7&T7: Control and treatment group at seven-day interval, showed remission of TNF-α in (T3) in contrast to (arrows) (C7) control group (arrow). C10: Control group appeared slightly expression of TNF-α (arrows) compared to completely absence of TNF-α in (T10) treatment group at 10-day interval. 100×.

Discussion

Lidocaine has been used for years in dental practice and is considered a safe and efficient well-known local anesthetic agent. Since the 1970 s, its pharmacology has been thoroughly studied. Besides its use in infiltration and block anesthesia, it is widely used topically to achieve anesthesia of skin or mucosa [18]. Other therapeutic effects of lidocaine include antiarrhythmic, antinociceptive, antithrombotic, and anti-inflammatory. This is due to its decreasing effect on inflammatory mediators [19]. Its anti-inflammatory action remains unclear; yet, it is suggested that lidocaine's anti-inflammatory effects can be seen at concentrations much lower than those needed to block sodium channels [20], Another theory has illustrated its effects on migration, exocytosis, phagocytosis, cell metabolism and by hampering membrane-ion transporters there is dysregulation of cellular pH levels with eventual depression of cytokine release [21]. One of these inflammatory cytokines is TNF-α. The receptors for this cytokine are expressed in a variety of tissues. Its main impact is on the interactions between leukocytes and blood vessel cells which start inflammatory processes with various spatial, temporal, and anatomical presentations using adhesion molecules such as E-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) [22]. In the current study, the aim was to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effect of lidocaine after topical treatment of the intraoral buccal wound with lidocaine via the histological and immunohistochemical study of the level of expression of the TNF-α. In the lidocaine group, the inflammatory reaction is obviously reduced at three days, there is decreasing in the number of inflammatory cells and formation of regular granulation tissue compared with the control group, these effects continue up and around ten days of healing periods. Inhibiting the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, the metabolic activity of leukocytes, and the release of histamine is how lidocaine achieves its anti-inflammatory effects, as has been well documented in the literature [23,24]. Triggered endothelial cells, macrophages, neutrophils, monocytes, B lymphocytes, neurons, dendritic cells, and astrocytes secrete the broadly bioactive peptide substance (TNF-α) [25], which promotes the production of IL-1β, IL-6, and other cytokines, such as IL-4 and IL-5 to attend a pivotal role in the inflammatory response [26]. Our study found that the inflammatory cytokine (TNF-α) was started to express during the first 24hr, after injury even after the application of lidocaine gel and treatment of the wound, then the level of TNF-α appeared to reduce after 3 days of healing periods and continue down-regulated up to 10 days after trauma. These results supported those of Karnina et al. who found that 2 mg/kg lidocaine effectively inhibited the inflammatory process by lowering TNF- protein levels at 24 hours after lidocaine treatment in the test group compared to the placebo group by suppressing NF-k mRNA expression, NF-k protein levels, and TNF- protein levels in mice with musculoskeletal injury [27]. Furthermore, the results of the additional study suggest that lidocaine may be a useful anti-inflammatory agent in endotoxemia [28]. In a similar vein, Lin et al. examined the effects of lidocaine on macrophages during inflammation in endotoxemia mice and the underlying mechanism. They discovered that lidocaine protects mice from LPS-induced inflammation and in a dose-dependent fashion inhibits lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced production of (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6). More so, Lidocaine can counteract the increased glycolysis and glycolytic capacity in macrophages that is caused by LPS [29]. In a previous study by Weinberg et, it was concluded that lidocaine, in supposition, is a potent anti-inflammatory agent, with properties that are often compared to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and steroids [30]. The current study's limitations were the lack of clinical trials to be compared.

Conclusion

According to the study's findings, the anti-inflammatory properties of lidocaine could be explored further from a therapeutic standpoint. However, the clinical use of this drug as an anti-inflammatory, such as that which occurs in the mouth, is not supported by sufficient, well-conducted trials at this time. More research is needed to determine whether lidocaine can be indicated in selected cases, but its potential anti-inflammatory effects make it of particular interest in dentistry when used in topical preparations.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Ghada A. Taqa. Methodology: Luma I. Al-Allaf. Writing original draft: Alyaa I. Naser. Visualization, Investigation: Rayan S. Hamed. Supervision: Rayan S. Hamed. Writing- Reviewing and Editing: Alyaa I. Naser.

Funding

The research is self-funded.

Ethical approval

This research was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Mosul, College of Dentistry (UoM.Dent/A.L.85/21).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Consent form is not applicable, this article does not contain any study involving human subjects, it's an experimental study.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Ghada A. Taqa. Methodology: Luma I. Al-Allaf. Writing original draft: Alyaa I. Naser. Visualization, Investigation: Rayan S. Hamed. Supervision: Rayan S. Hamed. Writing- Reviewing and Editing: Alyaa I. Naser.

Acknowledgement

We thank the Collage of Dentistry University of Mosul for their support in conducting this research.

References

  1. Swieboda P, Filip R, Prystupa A, Drozd M. Assessment of pain: types, mechanism and treatment. Ann Agric Environ Med 2013;1:2–7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Grace PM, Hutchinson MR, Maier SF, Watkins LR. Pathological pain and the neuroimmune interface. Nat Rev Immunol 2014;14:217–231. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fang JQ, Du JY, Liang Y, Fang JF. Intervention of electroacupuncture on spinal p38 mapk/atf 2/vr 1 pathway in treating inflammatory pain induced by CFA in rats. Mol Pain 2013;9:13. [Google Scholar]
  4. Del Giorno R, Frumento P, Varrassi G, Paladini A, Coaccioli S. Assessment of chronic pain and access to pain therapy. A cross sectional population based study. J Pain Res 2017;10:2577–2584. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang B, He XL, Ding Y, Du GH. Gaultherin, a natural salicylate derivative from Gaultheria yunnanensis: towards a better non steroidal anti inflammatory drug. Eur J Pharmacol 2006;530:166–171. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caracas HC, Maciel JV, Martins PM, de Souza MM, Maia LC. The use of lidocaine as an anti-inflammatory substance: a systematic review. J Dent 2009;37: 93–97. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang S, Li Y, Tu Y. Lidocaine attenuates CFA-induced inflammatory pain in rats by regulating the MAPK/ERK/NF-κB signaling pathway. Exp Ther Med 2021;21: 211. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gonzalez ACO, Costa TF, Andrade ZA, et al. Wound healing − a literature review. An Bras Dermatol 2016;91: 614–620. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sabir A, Sumidarti A. Interleukin-6 expression on inflamed rat dental pulp tissue after capped with Trigona sp. propolis from south Sulawesi, Indonesia. Saudi J Biol Sci 2017;24: 1034–1037. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nibali L, Fedele S, D'Aiuto F, Donos N. Interleukin-6 in oral diseases: a review. Oral Dis 2012;18: 236–243. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kobayashi S, Ogawa N, Fujimura Y, et al. Water-soluble component in dried chrysanthemum flower stimulates tumor necrosis factor − a production by mouse macrophage like cell line RAW 264.7. Food Sci Technol Res 2006;12: 144–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Caracas HC, Maciel JV, de Souza MM, Maia LC. The use of lidocaine as an anti-inflammatory substance: a systematic review. J Dent 2009;37: 93–97. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cruz FF, Rocco PRM, Pelosi P. Anti-inflammatory properties of anesthetic agents. Crit Care 2017;21:67. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Naser AI. Evaluation of Chitosan as Accelerator for Skin Wound Healing. (An Experimental Study). MSc Thesis Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery University of Mosul College of Dentistry, 2012, p. 64. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fathi WK. The effect of hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma on soft tissue wound healing: an experimental study on rabbits. Al–Rafidain Dent J. 2012;12: 115–125. [Google Scholar]
  16. Meutia Sari L, Mubarak Z, Keumala Sari D. Evaluation of clinical, histology, TNF-α, and collagen expressions on oral ulcer in rats after treatment with areca nut and chrysanthemum oral gel. F1000Res 2021;10:623. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Etemad-Moghadam S, Khalili M, Tirgary F, et al. Evaluation of myofibroblasts in oral epithelial dysplasia and squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 2009;38: 639–643. [Google Scholar]
  18. Vianney D, Amélie E, Vigé AC, et al. Efficacy of topical 1% lidocaine in the symptomatic treatment of pain associated with oral mucosal trauma or minor oral aphthous ulcer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-dose study. J Orofacial Pain 2011;25: 327. [Google Scholar]
  19. Karnina R, Arif SK, Hatta M, Bukhari A. Molecular mechanisms of lidocaine. Ann Med Surg 2021;69:102733. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Weinberg L. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lignocaine: a review. World J Anesthesiol 2015; 4. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ali ZA, El-Mallakh RS. Nebulized lidocaine in COVID-19, an hypothesis. Med Hypotheses 2020;144:109947. [Google Scholar]
  22. Parameswaran N, Patial S. Tumor necrosis factor-α signaling in macrophages. Crit Rev Eukaryotic Gene Express 2010;20:2. [Google Scholar]
  23. Berger C, Rossaint J, Van Aken H, Westphal M, Hahnenkamp K, Zarbock A. Lidocaine reduces neutrophil recruitment by abolishing chemokine-induced arrest and transendothelial migration in septic patients. J Immunol 2014;192:367–376. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nishina K, Mikawa K, Takao Y, Shiga M, Maekawa N, Obara H. Intravenous lidocaine attenuates acute lung injury induced by hydrochloric acid aspiration in rabbits. Anesthesiology 1998;88: 1300–1309. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Caminero A, Comabella M, Montalban X. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF α), anti TNF α and demyelination revisited: an ongoing story. J Neuroimmunol 2011;234:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  26. Luo Y, Pang Z, Zhu Q, Cai X, Yin Y, Wang M et al. Locally instilled tumor necrosis factor α antisense oligonucleotide inhibits allergic inflammation via the induction of Tregs. J Gene Med 2012;14:374–383. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Karnina R, Arif SK, Hatta M, Bukhari A, Natzir R, Patellongi I, Kaelan C. Systemic lidocaine administration influences NF-kβ gene expression, NF-kβ and TNF-α protein levels on BALB/c mice with musculoskeletal injury. Ann Med Surg 2021;69:102660. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. G. Feng, S. Liu, G.-L. Wang, G.-J. Liu, Lidocaine Attenuates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Acute Lung Injury through Inhibiting NF-κB Activation. Pharmacology 2008;81:32–40. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lin S, Jin P, Shao C, Lu W, Xiang Q, Jiang Z et al. Lidocaine attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses and protects against endotoxemia in mice by suppressing HIF1α-induced glycolysis. Int Immunopharmacol 2020;80:106150. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Maab AAS, Mustafa F. Anti-inflammatory aspects of lidocaine: a neglected therapeutic stance for COVID-19. Hear Lung 2020;49:877–878. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table I

p-values of Wilcoxon signed ranks test for histopathological readings.

In the text
Table II

p-values of Wilcoxon signed ranks test for immunohistochemical readings.

In the text

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Photomicrographs of rabbit oral mucosa for histopathological examination. A1&2: Control and treatment group respectively at one-day interval reveals heavy infiltration of inflammatory cells. B1&2: Control and treatment group respectively at three-day interval reveals slightly decrease of inflammation in treatment group compared to control group. C1&2; D1&2: Control and treatment group at seven-day interval and control and treatment group at 10-day interval respectively show superior healing process and decreasing of inflammatory reaction and formation of granulation tissue more regular than control group. H&E stain, 100×, 400×.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Photomicrographs of rabbit oral mucosa for immunohistochemical examination of TNF-α. C1: Heavy expression of TNF-α (arrows) in control group compared to (T1) treatment group at one-day interval reveals heavy infiltration of inflammatory cells. C3: TNF-α also continue to express in control group, while reduced in treatment group (arrows) (T3) at three-day interval. C7&T7: Control and treatment group at seven-day interval, showed remission of TNF-α in (T3) in contrast to (arrows) (C7) control group (arrow). C10: Control group appeared slightly expression of TNF-α (arrows) compared to completely absence of TNF-α in (T10) treatment group at 10-day interval. 100×.
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.