EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 32 / No 1 (2026) J Oral Med Oral Surg, 32 1 (2026) 2 References
Open Access
Issue
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 32, Number 1, 2026
Article Number 2
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2026005
Published online 17 March 2026
  1. Hosseinpour S, Khademi MH, Erfani M, Mosaddad SA, Heboyan A. Are implant-based treatments considered viable for patients with focal or florid cemento-osseous dysplasia? A systematic review. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2024;46:23. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wright JM, Vered M. Update from the 4th edition of the World Health Organization classification of head and neck tumours: odontogenic and maxillofacial bone tumors. Head Neck Pathol 2017;11:68–77. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cavalcanti PHP, Nascimento EHL, Pontual MLDA, Pontual ADA, Marcelos PGCL de, Perez DE da C, et al. Cemento-Osseous Dysplasias: Imaging Features Based on Cone Beam Computed tomography scans. Braz Dent J 2018;29:99–104. [Google Scholar]
  4. Decolibus K, Shahrabi-Farahani S, Brar A, Rasner SD, Aguirre SE, Owosho AA. Cemento-osseous dysplasia of the jaw: demographic and clinical analysis of 191 new cases. Dent J (Basel) 2023;11:138. [Google Scholar]
  5. Daviet-Noual V, Ejeil AL, Gossiome C, Moreau N, Salmon B. Differentiating early stage florid osseous dysplasia from periapical endodontic lesions: a radiological-based diagnostic algorithm. BMC Oral Health 2017;17:161. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kumar Y, Anand R, Bhagat N, Chakarvarty K, Jaiswal Y. Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia presenting as secondary osteomyelitis: a case report of an undiagnosed condition. Cureus 2024;16:e70291. [Google Scholar]
  7. Smith MH, Harms PW, Newton DW, Lebar B, Edwards SP, Aronoff DM. Mandibular Actinomyces osteomyelitis complicating florid cemento-osseous dysplasia: case report. BMC Oral Health 2011;11:21. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kato C de NA de O, de Arruda JAA, Mendes PA, Neiva IM, Abreu LG, Moreno A, et al. Infected cemento-osseous dysplasia: analysis of 66 cases and literature review. Head Neck Pathol 2020;14:173–182. [Google Scholar]
  9. Alsufyani NA, Lam EWN. Osseous (cemento-osseous) dysplasia of the jaws: clinical and radiographic analysis. J Can Dent Assoc 2011;77:b70. [Google Scholar]
  10. Singer SR, Mupparapu M, Rinaggio J. Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia and chronic diffuse osteomyelitis report of a simultaneous presentation and review of the literature. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:927–931. [Google Scholar]
  11. Saikia J, Pachipulusu B, Govindaraju P. Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia associated with chronic suppurative osteomyelitis and multiple impacted tooth an incidental finding - a rare case report. J Family Med Prim Care 2020;9:1757–1761. [Google Scholar]
  12. Demyati AK. Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia associated with secondary infection - a case report. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2023;13:232–235. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fokam ST, Kwedi GK, Messanga CB. Infected florid cemento-osseous dysplasia: about one clinical observation. Adv Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;7:100298. [Google Scholar]
  14. Decani S, Quatrale M, Costa D, Moneghini L, Varoni EM. Florid cemento-osseous dysplasia: a case report and review of literature. Heliyon. 2024;10:e33746. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hu H, Liu L, Man Y, Ye Z, You M. Clinical and radiologic outcomes of dental implants in cemento-osseous dysplasia: a systematic review and retrospective case series. BMC Oral Health 2025;25:1117. [Google Scholar]
  16. Indermun S, Titinchi F, Alwan J, Morkel J, Nortje CJ. Osteosarcoma associated with cemento-osseous dysplasia: co-incidence or two related entities? Oral Radiol 2024;40:546–554. [Google Scholar]
  17. Seo DJ, Moon SY, You JS, Oh JS. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis in a patient with florid cemento-osseous dysplasia. J Oral Med Pain 2024;46:49–46. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.