Open Access
Issue
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 32, Number 1, 2026
Article Number 4
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2026006
Published online 20 March 2026
  1. Kämmerer PW, Heimes D, Hartmann A, Kesting M, Khoury F, Schiegnitz E, et al. Clinical insights into traumatic injury of the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves: a comprehensive approach from diagnosis to therapeutic interventions. Clin Oral Investig 2024;28:216. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tomaselli L. Quad zygomatic implants: case series. Ann Stomatol 2024;4:3. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nunes M, de Araújo NobreM, Camargo V. All-on-4 hybrid with extra-long transnasal implants: descriptions of the technique and short-term outcomes in three cases. J Clin Med 2024;13:3348. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aparicio C. The zygoma anatomy-guided approach: ZAGAa patient-specific therapy concept for the rehabilitation of the atrophic Maxilla. In: Zygomatic Implants, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020:63–85. [Google Scholar]
  5. Aparicio C, Olivo A, de Paz V, Kraus D, Luque MM, Crooke E, et al. The zygoma anatomy-guided approach (ZAGA) for rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla. Clin Dent Rev 2022;6:2. [Google Scholar]
  6. Singh T, Kumar N, Sharma A. Evaluation of versatility and effectiveness of pedicled buccal fat pad for reconstruction of oral defects. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 2021;5:334–342. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jolly SS, Singh A, Rattan V. The buccal fat pad as a primary flap for the reconstruction of intraoral defect after resection of oral cavity malignant tumors: a retrospective study. J Craniofac Surg 2024;35:e109–e111. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pizzolante T, Rasicci P, Saggiomo AP, Principi M, Capogreco M, Mummolo S. Buccal fat pad flap and buccal advancement flap for closure of oroantral fistula: a systematic review and a case report. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2024;16:50–61. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mallesh N, Akshatha MV, Hussien H. Study of the efficacy of pedicled buccal fat pad graft technique in the management of oro-antral communications. Int J Dent Res 2020;5:7–13. [Google Scholar]
  10. Blanco-Ruiz S, Molinero-Mourelle P, Blanco-Ruiz M, Fernández-Tresguerres F, Blanco-Samper S, López-Quiles J. Effect of the buccal fat pad in the prevention of zygomatic implant surgery postoperative complications: a pilot study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2023;28:e371–e377. [Google Scholar]
  11. Alfaro F, Ragucci G, Valls-Ontańón A, Hamawandi A, Bertos-Quílez J. Extramaxillary zygomatic implant coverage with a pedicled buccal fat pad flap through a tunnel approach: a prospective case series. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac Implants 2022;37:400–406. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rahpeyma A, Khajehahmadi S. Buccal fat pad graft in maxillofacial surgery. Indian J Surg Oncol 2021;12:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  13. Collier J, Dawood A. The reverse zygomatic implant: a new implant for maxillofacial reconstruction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;54:e110. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rigolizzo MB, Camilli JA, Francischone CE, Padovani CR, Brånemark P-I. Zygomatic bone: anatomic bases for osseointegrated implant anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:441–447. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rossi M, Duarte LR, Mendonça R, Fernandes A. Anatomical bases for the insertion of zygomatic implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008;10:271–275. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bacci C, Manera C, Meneghetti D, Dhelpra I, Sbricoli L. Efficacy of Bichat’s buccal fat pad advancement in the treatment of odontogenic maxillary sinus fistulas. Surgeries 2025;6:10. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mohammadi A, Hassani A, Fazlisalehi O. Use of buccal fat pad in facial cosmetic surgery. In: Keyhan SO, Fattahi T, Bagheri SC, Bohluli B, Amirzade-Iranaq MH, eds Integrated Procedures in Facial Cosmetic Surgery, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021:887–901. [Google Scholar]
  18. Davis SJ, Park C, Shipchandler IT, Abdulhak A, Vernon D, Lee HB, et al. Buccal fat advancement-transposition flap for reconstruction of midface volume defects. Facial Plast Surg Aesthetic Med 2024;26:497–502. [Google Scholar]
  19. Akşamoğlu M, Bayar Muluk N, Şahan MH. Changes of the buccal fat pad volume according to the different age groups, gender, and body mass index: an evaluation with computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2025;49:156–164. [Google Scholar]
  20. De Moraes E. The buccal fat pad flap: an option to prevent and treat complications regarding complex zygomatic implant surgery. preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:905–910. [Google Scholar]
  21. Abdel-Fatah R, Saleh W, El-Sharkawy H. Efficacy of buccal pad fat as a new approach in the treatment of gingival recession: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health 2024;24:768. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chrcanovic BR, Abreu MHNG. Survival and complications of zygomatic implants: a systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;17:81–93. [Google Scholar]
  23. Aparicio C, Manresa C, Francisco K, Claros P, Alández J, González‐Martín O, et al. Zygomatic implants: indications, techniques and outcomes, and the zygomatic success code. Periodontol 2000 2014;66:41–58. [Google Scholar]
  24. Aparicio C, Aparicio A. ZAGA double pedicle palatal flap for soft tissue management in zygomatic surgery. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2024;45:1–23. [Google Scholar]
  25. Leroy C, Longis J, Bertin H, Mader M, Bonnet R. Complications and risk factors associated with zygomatic implants: retrospective analysis with 73 consecutive patients followed for 3.5 years. Quintessence Int (Berl) 2025;56:46. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lobna Elwan, Elprince N, Sweedan A. Evaluation of using buccal pad of free fat tissue transfer with immediate implant placement in the maxillary posterior area (clinical trial). Alexandria Dent J 2021;46:43–49. [Google Scholar]
  27. De Moraes EJ, Leigthon Y, Olate S, De Moraes LEB. The buccal fat pad technique an option to prevent complications in zygomatic implants surgery: 5–13 years follow up. SVOA Dent 2023;4:162–171. [Google Scholar]
  28. Samson J, Pandurangan P, Balasubramanian A, Jayabalan J. Versatility of buccal pad of fat in the reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial defects - a review. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2021; 10:3441–3445. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.