EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 32 / No 1 (2026) J Oral Med Oral Surg, 32 1 (2026) 8 References
Open Access
Issue
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 32, Number 1, 2026
Article Number 8
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2025034
Published online 24 April 2026
  1. Okay DJ, Genden E, Buchbinder D, Urken M. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: A classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86: 352–363. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pellegrino G, BFRL. Posters. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25: 491. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aparicio C, Manresa C, Francisco K, Claros P, Alández J, González‐Martín O, et al. Zygomatic implants: indications, techniques and outcomes, and the Zygomatic Success Code. Periodontol 2000 2014;66:41–58. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pineau M, Nicot R, Lauwers L, Ferri J, Raoul G. Zygomatic implants in our daily practice. Part II: Prosthetic rehabilitation and effect on quality of life. Swiss Dent J 2018;128: 694–700. [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown JS, Rogers SN, McNally DN, Boyle M. A modified classification for the maxillectomy defect. Head Neck 2000;22:17–26. [Google Scholar]
  6. Raoul G, Ruhin B, Briki S, Lauwers L, Haurou Patou G, Capet JP, et al. Microsurgical reconstruction of the jaw with fibular grafts and implants. J Craniofac Surg 2009;20:2105–2117. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pellegrino G, Tarsitano A, Basile F, Pizzigallo A, Marchetti C. Computer-aided rehabilitation of maxillary oncological defects using zygomatic implants: A defect-based classification. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;73:2446.e1–2446.e11. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown JS, Shaw RJ. Reconstruction of the maxilla and midface: introducing a new classification. Lancet Oncol 2010;11: 1001–1008. [Google Scholar]
  9. Boyes-Varley JG, Howes DG, Davidge-Pitts KD, Brånemark I McAlpine JA. A protocol for maxillary reconstruction following oncology resection using zygomatic implants. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:521–531. [Google Scholar]
  10. Davó R, Felice P, Pistilli R, Barausse C, Marti-Pages C, Ferrer-Fuertes A, Ippolito DR, Esposito M. Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2018;11:145–161. PMID: 29806663. [Google Scholar]
  11. Solà Pérez A, Pastorino D, Aparicio C, Pegueroles Neyra M, Khan RS, Wright S, Ucer C. Success rates of zygomatic implants for the rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxilla: a systematic review. Dent J (Basel) 2022;10:151. [Google Scholar]
  12. Aboul-Hosn Centenero S, Lázaro A, Giralt-Hernando M, Hernández-Alfaro F. Zygoma Quad compared with 2 zygomatic implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Implant Dent 2018;27: 246–253. [Google Scholar]
  13. Byun SH, Lim HK, Yang BE, Kim SM, Lee JH. Delayed reconstruction of palatomaxillary defect using fibula free flap. J Clin Med 2020;9:884. [Google Scholar]
  14. Peng X, Mao C, Yu GY, Guo CB, Huang MX, Zhang Y, et al. Functional maxillary reconstruction with free composite fibula flap. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2011;43:18–21. Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  15. Butterworth CJ, Rogers SN. The zygomatic implant perforated (ZIP) flap: A new technique for combined surgical reconstruction and rapid fixed dental rehabilitation following low-level maxillectomy. Int J Implant Dent 2017;3:37. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.