EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 31 / No 3 (2025) J Oral Med Oral Surg, 31 3 (2025) 23 References
Open Access
Issue
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 31, Number 3, 2025
Article Number 23
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2025027
Published online 28 July 2025
  1. Brown JS, Shaw RJ. Reconstruction of the maxilla and midface: introducing a new classification. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:1001–1008. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wolfaardt J, Gehl G, Farmand M, et al. Indications and methods of care for aspects of extraoral osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;32:124–131. [Google Scholar]
  3. Abu-Serriah MM, McGowan DA, Moos KF, et al. Outcome of extra-oral craniofacial endosseous implants. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;39:269–275. [Google Scholar]
  4. Abu-Serriah MM, McGowan DA, Moos KF, et al. Extra-oral endosseous craniofacial implants: current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;32:452–458. [Google Scholar]
  5. Flood TR, Russell K. Reconstruction of nasal defects with implant-retained nasal prostheses. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;36:341–345. [Google Scholar]
  6. Nishimura RD, Roumanas E, Moy PK, et al. Nasal defects and osseointegrated implants: UCLA experience. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:597–602. [Google Scholar]
  7. Nowak SM, Silk H, Ilankovan V. New approach for the anchorage of nasal implants without osseointegration using the Epiplating system for a magnetic prosthesis. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;58:488–490. [Google Scholar]
  8. Davies I, Himesha B. Medawela RMS, Evans PL, et al. Immediate Prosthetic nasal rehabilitation following rhinectomy: indications and limitations of the epiplating system − a case series. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2025; S0266435625000105. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hackett S, El‐Wazani B, Butterworth C. Zygomatic implant‐based rehabilitation for patients with maxillary and mid‐facial oncology defects: a review. Oral Dis 2021;27:27–41. [Google Scholar]
  10. Butterworth CJ. Primary vs secondary zygomatic implant placement in patients with head and neck cancer—A 10-year prospective study. Head Neck 2019;41:1687–1695. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pineau M, Nicot R, Lauwers L, et al. Das Zygoma-Implantat in unserer täglichen Praxis: Teil I: Behandlungsplan und OP­-Technik. SWISS Dent J SSO − Sci Clin Top 2018;128:701–705. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bowden JR, Flood TR, Downie IP. Zygomaticus implants for retention of nasal prostheses after rhinectomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;44:54–56. [Google Scholar]
  13. Scott N, Kittur MA, Evans PL, et al. The use of zygomatic implants for the retention of nasal prosthesis following rhinectomy: the Morriston experience. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45:1044–1048. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ethunandan M, Downie I, Flood T. Implant-retained nasal prosthesis for reconstruction of large rhinectomy defects: the Salisbury experience. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;39:343–349. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, et al. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. BMJ Case Rep 2013; bcr 2013201554. [Google Scholar]
  16. Koudougou C, Bertin H, Lecaplain B, et al. Postimplantation radiation therapy in head and neck cancer patients: literature review. Head Neck 2020;42:794–802. [Google Scholar]
  17. Claudy MP, Miguens Jr SAQ, Celeste RK, et al. Time interval after radiotherapy and dental implant failure: systematic review of observational studies and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:402–411. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wälivaara D-Å, Isaksson S, Johansson L-Å. Frontal bone and modified zygomatic implants for retention of a nasal prosthesis: surgical planning using a three-dimensional computer software program. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2011;45:109–112. [Google Scholar]
  19. Boyes-Varley JG, Howes DG, Davidge-Pitts KD, et al. A protocol for maxillary reconstruction following oncology resection using zygomatic implants. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20:521–531. [Google Scholar]
  20. Granström G, Tjellström A, Brånemark PI. Osseointegrated implants in irradiated bone: a case-controlled study using adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;57:493–499. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.