EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 30 / No 2 (2024) J Oral Med Oral Surg, 30 2 (2024) 15 References
Open Access
Issue
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 30, Number 2, 2024
Article Number 15
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2024018
Published online 08 August 2024
  1. Raikar S, Talukdar P, Kumari S, Panda SK, Oommen VM, Prasad A. Factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants: a retrospective study. J Int Soc Prev Commun Dent 2017;7:351–355. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Yang Y, Hu H, Zeng M, Chu H, Gan Z, Duan J et al. The survival rates and risk factors of implants in the early stage: a retrospective study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21:293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wright SP, Hayden J, Lynd JA, Walker-Finch K, Willett J, Ucer C, Speechley SD. Factors affecting the complexity of dental implant restoration − what is the current evidence and guidance? Br Dent J 2016; 18;221(10): 615–622. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mehta SP, Sutariya PV, Pathan MR, Upadhyay HH, Patel SR, Kantharia ND. Clinical success between tilted and axial implants in edentulous maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Indian Prosthodontic Soc 2021;21:217. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rosen A, Gynther G. Implant treatment without bone grafting in edentulous severely resorbed maxillas: a long-term follow-up study. J Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:1010–1016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Patel K, Madan S, Mehta D, Shah SP, Trivedi V, Seta H. Basal implants: an asset for rehabilitation of atrophied resorbed maxillary and mandibular jaw − a prospective study. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2021;11:64–69. [Google Scholar]
  7. Manacorda M, Poletti de Chaurand B, Merlone A, Tetè G, Mottola F, Vinci R. Virtual implant rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxilla: a radiographic study. Dent J (Basel). 2020;8:14. [Google Scholar]
  8. Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Freitas Júnior AC, Anchieta RB, Poveda R, Gupta N, Coelho PG. Tilted and short implants supporting fixed prosthesis in an atrophic maxilla: A 3D-FEA biomechanical evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Related Res 2015; 17 Suppl 1: e332–e 342. [Google Scholar]
  9. Abdel-Khalek EA, Khalifa AK, Elmekawy N. The effect of using prefabricated bars on marginal bone loss around tilted or axially placed and immediately loaded implants for retaining mandibular overdentures. J Dent Implant 2018;8:54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Malo P, Miguel de Araujo N, Lopes A. Preliminary report on the outcome of tilted implants with longer lengths (20-25 mm) in low-density bone: one-year follow up of a prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Related Res 2013;17:134–142. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nag PVR, Sarika P, Khan R, Bhagwatkar T. Tall and tilted pin hole immediately loaded implants (TTPHIL) technique for maxillary arch rehabilitation. Int J Res Rev 2018;5:104–110. [Google Scholar]
  12. Nag PVR, Sarika P, Bhagwatkar T, Dhara V. Pterygoid implant: option for rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla. Int J Contemp Dent Med Rev 2019;19:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rodrigues VA, Tribst JPM, de Santis LR, de Lima DR, Nishioka RS. Influence of angulation and vertical misfit in the evaluation of micro-deformations around implants. Braz Dent Sci 2017;20:32–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rodrigues VA, Tribst JPM, Santis LR, Borges ALS, Nishioka RS. 2018. Biomechanical effect of inclined implants in fixed prosthesis: strain and stress analysis. Rev Odontolog UNESP 47:237–243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B, Van Roekel N. Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:326–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vasconcellos LG, Nishioka RS, Vasconcellos LM, Balducci I, Kojima AN. Microstrain around dental implants supporting fixed partial prostheses under axial and nonaxial loading conditions, in vitro strain gauge analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2013;24:e54651. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Koutouzis T, Wennström JL. Bone level changes at axial- and non-axial-positioned partial implants supporting fixed dentures. A 5-year retrospective longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18 (5): 585–590. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol 1972;43:38. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pérez-Pevida E, Chávarri-Prado D, Diéguez-Pereira M, Estrada-Martínez A, Montalbán-Vadillo O, Jiménez-Garrudo A. Consequences of peri-implant bone loss in the occlusal load transfer to the supporting bone in terms of magnitude of stress, strain, and stress distribution: a finite element analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:3087071. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee DW, Lee DW, Park KH, Moon IS. The effects of off-axial loading on periimplant marginal bone loss in a single implant. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:501–507. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim KS, Kim YL, Bae JM, Cho HW. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26: 976–984. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? J Periodontol 2002;73:322–333. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.