Open Access
Issue
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 26, Number 2, 2020
Article Number 11
Number of page(s) 6
Section Article original / Original article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2020007
Published online 01 April 2020
  1. Disa J, Cordeiro P. Mandible reconstruction with microvascular surgery. Semin Surg Oncol 2000;19:226–234. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hidalgo DA, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Hu QY. A review of 716 consecutive free flaps for oncologic surgical defects: refinement in donor-site selection and technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:722–732; discussion 733-734. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sozzi D, Novelli G, Silva R, Connelly ST, Tartaglia GM. Implant rehabilitation in fibula-free flap reconstruction: a retrospective study of cases at 1-18 years following surgery. J Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg 2017;45:1655–1661. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bodard AG, Salino S, Bemer J, Lucas R, Breton P. Dental implant placement after mandibular reconstruction by microvascular free fibula flap: Current knowledge and remaining questions. Oral Oncol 2011;47:1099–1104. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chiapasco M, Romeo E, Coggiola A, Brusati R. Long-term outcome of dental implants placed in revascularized fibula free flaps used for the reconstruction of maxillo-mandibular defects due to extreme atrophy. Clin Oral Impl Res 2011;22:83–91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Granström G. Osseointegration in irradiated cancer patients: an analysis with respect to implant failures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:579–585. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Compton SM, Clark D, Chan S, Kuc I, Wubie BA, Levin L. Dental implants in the elderly population: a long-term follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017;32:164–170. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gbara A, Darwich K, Li L, Schmelzle L, Blake F. Long-term results of jaw reconstruction with microvascular fibula graft and dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:1005–1009. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kullman L, Al Asfour A, Zetterqvist L, Andersson L. Comparison of radiographic bone height assessments in panoramic and intraoral radiographs of implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:96–100. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zechner W, Watzac G, Gahleitner A, Busenlechner D, Tepper G, Watzek G. Rotational panoramic versus intraoral rectangular radiographs for evaluation of peri-implant bone loss in the anterior atrophic mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:873–878. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Meijer HJA, Boven C, Delli K, Raghoebar GM. Is there an effect of crown-to-implant ratio on implant treatment outcomes? A systematic review. Clin Oral Impl Res 2018;29 (suppl 18):243–252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Laverty DP, Kelly R, Addison O. Survival of dental implants placed in autogenous bone grafst and bone flaps in head and neck oncology patients: a systematic review. Int J Implant Dent 2018;4:19. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Watzinger F, Ewers R, Henninger A, Sudasch G, Babka A, Woelfl G. Endosteal implants in the irradiated lower jaw. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1996;24:237–244. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. De Maesschalck T, Courvoisier DS, Scolozzi P. Computer-assisted versus traditional freehand taechnique in fibular free flap mandibular reconstruction: a morphological comparative study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274:517–526. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bui Quoc J, Vang A, Evrard L. Peri implant bone loss at implants placed in preserved alveolar bone versus implants placed in native bone: a retrospective radiographic study. The Open Dentistry J 2018;12:529–545. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Barone A, Orlando B, Cingano L, Marconcini S, Derchi G, Covani U. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets: 3-year results. J Periodontol 2012;83:836–846. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shaw RJ, Sutton AF, Cawood JI, Howell RA, Lowe D, Brown JS, Rogers SN, Vaughar ED. Oral rehabilitation after treatment for head and neck malignancy. Head Neck 2005;27:459–470. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chiapasco M, Romeo E, Coggiola A, Brusati R. Clinical outcome of dental implants placed in fibula-free flaps used for the reconstruction of maxillo-mandibular defects following ablation for tumors or osteoradionecrosis. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2006;17:220–228. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jackson RS et al. Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Osseointegrated Dental Implantation of Fibula Free Flaps for Mandibular Reconstruction. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016;18:201–216. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shugaa-Addin B, Al Shamini HM, Al Maweri S, Tarakji B. The effect of radiotherapy on survival of dental implants in head and neck cancer patients. J Clin Exp Dent 2016;8:e194-e200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Salinas TJ et al. Clinical evaluation of implants in radiated fibula flaps. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:524–529. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kumar VV, Ebenezer S, Kämmerer PW, Jacob PC, Kuriakose MA, Hedne N, Wagner W, Al-Nawas B. Implants in free fibula flap supporting dental rehabilitation − implant and peri-implant related outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016;44:1849–1858. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ciocca L, Corinaldesi C, Marchetti C, Scotti R. Gingival hyperplasia around implants in the maxilla and jaw reconstructed by fibula flap. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:478–480. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chang Y, Chan C, Shen Y, Wei F. Soft tissue management using palatal mucosa around endosteal implants in vascularised composite grafts in the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:341–343. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Iizuka T, Häfliger J, Seto I, Rahal A, Mericske-Stern R, Smolka K. Oral rehabilitation after mandibular reconstruction using an osteocutaneous fibula free flap with endosseous implants. Factors affecting the functional outcome in patients with oral cancer. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:69–79. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.