EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 21 / No 3 (juillet 2015) Med Buccale Chir Buccale, 21 3 (2015) 127-135 References
Open Access
Issue
Med Buccale Chir Buccale
Volume 21, Number 3, juillet 2015
Page(s) 127 - 135
Section Article original / Original article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2015028
Published online 07 August 2015
  1. Haroun A. Recommandations de l’HAS sur l’avulsion des troisièmes molaires. Bull Un Nat Int Ortho Dento-Fac 2008;37:22-37. [Google Scholar]
  2. Korbendau JM, Korbendau X. L’extraction de la dent de sagesse. Ed. Quint Int, Paris, 2001, p 48. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chu FC, Li TK, Lui VK, Newsome PR, Chow RL, Cheung LK. Prevalence of impacted teeth and associated pathologies: a radiographic study of the Hong Kong Chinese population. Hong Kong Med J 2003;9(3):158-163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sandhu SS, Kapila BK. Incidence of impacted third molars. J Indian Dent Assoc 1982;54:441-444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ould Mohameden A. Étude des inclusions et enclavements des troisièmes molaires dans une population mauritanienne. Thèse Chir Dent Dakar : 2008, n° 6. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gunepin M, Derache F, Bedrune B, Fronty Y. Indications d’avulsion des dents de sagesse mandibulaires dans le cadre militaire. Med Bucc Chir Bucc 2008;14(4):193-208. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  7. Diniz-Freitas M, Lago-Méndez L, Gude-Sampedro F, Somoza-Martin JM, Gándara-Rey JM, García-García A. Pederson scale fails to predict how difficult it will be to extract lower third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;45:23-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rood JP, Shebab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;28(1):20-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Freudlsperger C, Deiss T, Bodem J, Engel M, Hoffmann J. Influence of lower third molar anatomic position on postoperative inflammatory complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70(6):1280-1285. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Barreiro-Torres J, Diniz-Freitas M, Lago-Mendez L. Gude-Sempedro F, Gandara-Rey JM, Garcia-Garcia A. Evaluation of the surgical difficulty in lower third molar extraction. Med Oral Patol Oral Chir Buc 2010;15(6):869-874. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Santamaria J, Arteagoitia I. Radiologic variables of clinical significance in the extraction of impacted mandibular third molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 84(5):469-473. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sedaghatfar M, August AM, Dodson TB. Panoramic radiographic findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure following third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63(1):3-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Marzola C, Comparin E, Toledo FJL. Third molars classisifications prevalance in the cities of Cunha Pora, Maravilha and Palmitos in the Nortwest of Santa Catarina state in Brazil. Revista Odontol Crencia 2006;21(51):55-66. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ardakani FE, Booshehri MZ, Navab Azam A. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography in determining the position of impacted third molars in relation to the inferior dental canal compared with surgery. Iran J Radiol 2010;7(2):91-96. [Google Scholar]
  15. Guiguimdé WPL, Millogo M, Konsem T, Ouedraogo D. Accidents d’évolution de la dent de sagesse inférieure au département d’odontostomatologie et de chirurgie maxillo-faciale du CHU Yalgado Ouédraogo. Med Bucc Chir Bucc 2015; DOI: 10.1051/mbcb/2014033. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hellmann M. Our third molar teeth: their eruption, presence and absence. Dent Cosm 1936;78:750-762. [Google Scholar]
  17. Murtomaa H, Turtola L, Ylipaavalniemi P, Rytomaa I. Status of the third molars in the 20- to 21-year-old Finnish university population. J Am Coll Health 1985;34:127-129. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Raslan F. Techniques chirurgicales d’extraction des dents de sagesse mandibulaires incluses enclavées. Thèse Chir Dent. Dakar : 1998, n° 10. [Google Scholar]
  19. Schmeling M, Olze A, Pynn BR, Kraul V, Schulz R, Heinecke A, et al. Dental age estimation based on third molar eruption in First Nation people of Canada. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2010;28(1):32-38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Peron JM. Accidents d’évolution des dents de sagesse. Encyl Med Chir Elsevier, Paris, Masson, Stomatol/Odontol 2003:22-032-E-10. [Google Scholar]
  21. Shetty DC, Ahuja P, Urs AB, Bablani D, Paul M. Epidemiological Status of 3rd Molars-Their Clinical Implications. J Oral Health Comm Dent 2010;4(1):12-15. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wenzel A, Aagaard E, Sindet-Pedersen S. Evaluation of a new radiographic technique: diagnostic accuracy for mandibular third molars. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27(5):255-263. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bell GW, Jennifer M, Rodgers, Rebecca J, Kelly L. The accuracy of dental panoramic tomographs in determining the root morphology of mandibular third molar teeth before surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 95(1):119-125. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ingibjorg S, Benediktsdotti R, Wenzel A, Petersen JK. Mandibular third molar removal: risk indicators for extended operation time, post- operative pain, and complications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;975(4):438-446. [Google Scholar]
  25. Carvalho RW, Do Egito Vasconcelos BC. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69(11):2714-2721. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yadav S, Tyagi S, Puri N, Kumar P. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of relationship between mandibular third molar and angle fracture on North Indian population: A clinico-radiographic study. Eur J Dent 2013;7:212-217. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Eliasson Y, Heimdahl A. Pathological changes related to long term impaction of third molars: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;18(4):210-212. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Monaco G, Montevecchi M, Bonetti GA, Antonel LA, Gatto MR. Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135(3):312-318. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kaka LN. Impacted mandibular third molar and the inferior alveolar canal in Iraqis (a radiographical study). Iraq 2008; 5(4):403-409. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hashemipour MA, Tahmashi-Arashlow M, Fahimi-Hanzaaei F. Incidence of impacted mandibular and maxillary third molars: a radiographic study in a Southeast Iran population. Med Oral Pathol Oral Chir Buc 2013;18(1):140-145. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ozen T, Orhan K, Gorur I, Ozturk A. Efficacy of low level laser therapy on neurosensory recovery after injury to the inferior alveolar nerve. Head Face Med 2006;2(1):3. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Farish SE, Bouloux GF. General technique of third molar removal. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am 2007;19(1):23-43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gupta S, Bhowate RR, Nigam N, Saxena S. Evaluation of impacted mandibular third molars by panoramic radiography. ISRN Dent 2011;406714. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hassan HA. Pattern of third molars impaction in a Saudi Population. Clin Cos Invest Dent 2010;2:109-113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yildirim G, Ataoğlu H, Bulut T, Kiziloğlu Menziletoğlu D, Özkan BT. Is it different in Turkish population: evaluation of impacted third molars. SÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2009;18:55-62. [Google Scholar]
  36. Susarlas M, Dodson TB. Estimating third molar extraction difficulty: a comparison of subjective and objective factors. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63(4):427-434. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Almendros-Marques N, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Influence of lower third molar position on the incidence of preoperative complications. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102(6):725-732. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Gomes ACA, Vasconcelos BCE, Silva EDO, Caldas AF. Sensitivity and specificity of pantomography to predict inferior alveolar nerve damage during extraction of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66(2):256-259. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith WP. The relative risk of neurosensory deficit following removal of mandibular third molar teeth: the influence of radiography and surgical technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;115(1):18-24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Valmaseda-Castellon E, Berini-Autes L, Gay-Escoda C. Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: A prospective study of 1117 surgical extractions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92(4):377-383. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Atieb AM. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography in determining relationship between inferior alveolar nerve and mandibular third molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68(1): 74-82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Carles S, Alpy A, Fenelon M, Duran M. Indications chirurgicales des lésions iatrogènes du nerf infra-alvéolaire et du nerf lingual : revue de la littérature. Med Bucc Chir Bucc 2015; DOI: 10.1051/mbcb/2014030. [Google Scholar]
  43. Haute Autorité de la Santé. Tomographie volumique à faisceau conique de la face (cone beam computerized tomography), Recommandations 2009. http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c.../rapport-cone-beam-version-finale. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.