Open Access
Issue
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 30, Number 3, 2024
Article Number 20
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2024023
Published online 16 October 2024
  1. Oh JS, Kim SG. Clinical study of the relationship between implant stability measurements using Periotest and Osstell mentor and bone quality assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;113:e35-e40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Elsawy MK, Eldestawy MT, Madany UM. Assessment of Osstell and Periotest systems in measuring immediate dental implants stability. Al-Azhar J Dent Sci 2020;23:173–179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Samman AA, Al-Rawee RY, Tawfeeq BA. Does primary stability is mandatory for dental implant success? a systematic review of literature. J Dent Oral Sci 2022;4:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  4. Buyukguclu G, Ozkurt-Kayahan Z, Kazazoglu E. Reliability of the Osstell implant stability quotient and penguin resonance frequency analysis to evaluate implant stability. Implant Dent 2018;27:429–433. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Di Stefano DA, Arosio P, Capparè P, Barbon S, Gherlone EF. Stability of dental implants and thickness of cortical bone: clinical research and future perspectives. a systematic review. Materials 2021;14:7183. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kocak-Buyukdere A, Kayabay G. Measurement of dental implant stability by two different techniques. Niger J Clin Pract 2021;24:973. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Oh JS, Kim SG, Lim SC, Ong JL. A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability: periotest and Osstell mentor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2009;107:513–518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee J, Pyo SW, Cho HJ, An JS, Lee JH, Koo KT, et al. Comparison of implant stability measurements between a resonance frequency analysis device and a modified damping capacity analysis device: an in vitro study. J Periodontal Res 2020;50:56–66. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee DH, Shin YH, Park JH, Shim JS, Shin SW, Lee JY. The reliability of anycheck device related to healing abutment diameter. J Adv Prosthodont 2020;12:83. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kim YW, Min SK, Wang JW, Shin KS. Assessment of factors that affect primary stability of minimally invasive implant (MII): an in vitro study. J Implantol Appl Sci 2022;26:1–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013;310:2191–2194. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strobe Initiative, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg 2014;12: 1500–1524. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mistry G, Shetty O, Shetty S, Singh R. Measuring implant stability: a review of different methods. J Dent Implant. 2014;4:165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Andreotti AM, Goiato MC, Nobrega AS, da Silva EVF, Filho HG, Pellizzer EP. et al., Relationship between implant stability measurements obtained by two different devices: a systematic review. J Periodontol 2017;88:281–288. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gómez-Polo M, Ortega R, Gómez-Polo C, Martin C, Celemin A, del Rio J. Does length, diameter, or bone quality affect primary and secondary stability in self-tapping dental implants?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74:1344–1353. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Andersson P, Verrocchi D, Viinamäki R, Sennerby L. A one-year clinical, radiographic and RFA study of neoss implants used in two-stage procedures. Appl Osseointegration Res 2008;6:23–26. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pyo SW, Kim HG, Kwon O, Otgonbold J, Lee KW. Reliability verification of damping capacity assessment through in vitro analysis of implant micromotion in peri-implant bone loss model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2021;36:106–114. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shim JS, Kim MY, An SJ, Kang ES, Choi YS. Evaluation of implant stability according to implant placement site and duration in elderly patients: a prospective multi-center cohort study. J Clin Med 2023;12:5087. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Joshi S, Dhatrak P, Nimbalkar S, Gherde C. An effect of various parameters on insertion torque to improve the success rate of dental implantation: a review. Mater Today: Proc 2021;43:928–934. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cassetta M, Brandetti G, Altieri F. Are the insertion torque value and implant stability quotient correlated, and if so, can insertion torque values predict secondary implant stability? A prospective parallel cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2022;37:135–142. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:85–92. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lages FS, Douglas-de Oliveira DW, Costa FO. Relationship between implant stability measurements obtained by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018;20:26–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Noaman AT, Bede SY. The relationship of implant stability quotient and insertion torque in dental implant stability. J Baghdad Coll Dent 2022;34:29–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Degidi M, Daprile G, Piattelli A. Primary stability determination by means of insertion torque and RFA in a sample of 4,135 implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:501–507. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lee HN, Kim MS, Lee JY, Xu Zihan, Ryu JJ, Shim JS. Reliability of implant stability measuring devices depending on various clinical conditions: an in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2023;15:126–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.