Open Access
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 29, Number 4, 2023
Article Number 44
Number of page(s) 13
Published online 02 February 2024
  1. Block MS, Emery RW. Static or dynamic navigation for implant placement—choosing the method of guidance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74:269–277. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Parra-Tresserra A, Marquès-Guasch J, Ortega-Martínez J, Basilio-Monné J, Hernández-Alfaro F. Current state of dynamic surgery. A literature review. Med Oral 2021;e576–e581. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kaewsiri D, Panmekiate S, Subbalekha K, Mattheos N, Pimkhaokham A. The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computer‐assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Impl Res 2019; clr. 13435. [Google Scholar]
  4. Block MS, Emery RW, Cullum DR, Sheikh A. Implant placement is more accurate using dynamic navigation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75:1377–1386. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gargallo-Albiol J, Barootchi S, Salomó-Coll O, Wang H lay. Advantages and disadvantages of implant navigation surgery. A systematic review. Ann Anat Anatomischer Anz 2019;225:1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019;l4898. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016;i4919. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pellegrino G, Lizio G, Rossi F, Tuci L, Ferraioli L, Stefanelli LV, et al. A 4 mm-long implant rehabilitation in the posterior maxilla with dynamic navigation technology: a case report after a three-years post-loading follow-up. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:9808. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stefanelli LV, Graziani U, Pranno N, Di Carlo S, Mandelaris GA. Accuracy of dynamic navigation surgery in the placement of pterygoid implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2020;40:825–834. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lopes A, Nobre MA, Santos D. The workflow of a new dynamic navigation system for the insertion of dental implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws: report of two cases. J Clin Med [Internet 2020;9. Disponible sur: [Google Scholar]
  11. Pellegrino G, Tarsitano A, Taraschi V, Vercellotti T, Marchetti C. Simplifying zygomatic implant site preparation using ultrasonic navigation: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:e67–e71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tso TV, Chao D, Tanner J, Freymiller EG, Jayanetti J. Prosthetic reconstruction of a patient with an irradiated total rhinectomy with navigated surgical placement of a single zygomatic implant: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:352–356. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang F, Bornstein MM, Hung K, Fan S, Chen X, Huang W, et al. Application of real-time surgical navigation for zygomatic implant insertion in patients with severely atrophic maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:80–87. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhou W, Fan S, Wang F, Huang W, Jamjoom FZ, Wu Y. A novel extraoral registration method for a dynamic navigation system guiding zygomatic implant placement in patients with maxillectomy defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021;50:116–120. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stefanelli LV, Mandelaris GA, Franchina A, Pranno N, Pagliarulo M, Cera F, et al. Accuracy of dynamic navigation system workflow for implant supported full arch prosthesis: a case series. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:E5038. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang M, Eitan M, Zhan Y, Shen H, Liu F. Digital workflow for prosthetically driven implant navigation surgery in a fully edentulous patient: a case report. Int J Comput Dent 2021;24:303–315. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Magic M, Wang F, Fan S, Wu Y. Dynamic navigation guidance for bone reduction in maxilla: case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2021;36:Ie1–Ie6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pozzi A, Arcuri L, Carosi P, Nardi A, Kan J. Clinical and radiological outcomes of novel digital workflow and dynamic navigation for single‐implant immediate loading in aesthetic zone: 1‐year prospective case series. Clin Oral Implants Res 2021;32:1397–1410. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pellegrino G, Taraschi V, Andrea Z, Ferri A, Marchetti C. Dynamic navigation: a prospective clinical trial to evaluate the accuracy of implant placement. Int J Comput Dent 2019;22:139–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pellegrino G, Taraschi V, Vercellotti T, Ben-Nissan B, Marchetti C. Three-dimensional implant positioning with a piezosurgery implant site preparation technique and an intraoral surgical navigation system: case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2017;32:e163–e165. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang H, Yang CY, Li Z. Traumatic displacement of teeth into maxillary sinus and the retrieval assisted by computer-assisted navigation: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e13865. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sato H, Shiogama S, Narihira K, Chikuda J, Nakamura S, Abe Y, et al. Removal of small foreign bodies from the maxillary sinus using CT image-guided surgical navigation and rapid paired-point registration and calibration with reference markers on an occlusal splint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Cases [Internet 2019;5. Disponible sur: [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang C, Wu J, Yang C, Liu N, Hui W, Zhang Y, et al. New solutions to improve the accuracy of the navigation-guided foreign body removal in craniomaxillofacial deep space. J Craniofac Surg 2020;31:e577–e580. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen S, Liu YH, Gao X, Yang CY, Li Z. Computer-assisted navigation for removal of the foreign body in the lower jaw with a mandible reference frame: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e18875. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Bensing JR, McElroy KE, Perez L. Retrieval of displaced third molar into the sublingual space using 3-dimensional navigation assistance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021;79: 537.e1–537.e7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Han SM, Chae HS, Lee HN, Jeon HJ, Bong JP, Kim JH. Computed tomography-guided navigation assisted drainage for inaccessible deep neck abscess: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). mars 2019;98:e14674. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang J, Zhang W, Wu SS, Guo CB, Cui NH. Navigation in bone-impacted premaxillary supernumerary tooth removal: a preliminary clinical trial. Int J Comput Dent 2021;24:363–374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pellegrino G, Lizio G, Ferri A, Marchetti C. Flapless and bone-preserving extraction of partially impacted mandibular third molars with dynamic navigation technology. A report of three cases. Int J Comput Dent 2021;24:253–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Felice P, Bonifazi L, Karaban M, Berti C, Pellegrino G, Barausse C. Dynamic navigated « Sandwich » technique: a novel surgical approach for safe osteotomies in the rehabilitation of an atrophic posterior mandible: a case report. Methods Protoc 2021;4:34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jain S, Solanki A. A dynamic surgical navigational approach for immediate implantation and transcrestal sinus augmentation. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2021;25:451–456. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang Y, Dai J, Fu X, Yang J, Fu Y, Li J. Real-time image-guided navigation in the management of alveolar cleft repair. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J [Internet 2021; ((Zhang Y; Dai J; Fu X; Li J., The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) and Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China). Disponible sur: [Google Scholar]
  32. Stefanelli LV, DeGroot BS, Lipton DI, Mandelaris GA. Accuracy of a dynamic dental implant navigation system in a private practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019;34:205–213. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pellegrino G, Mangano C, Mangano R, Ferri A, Taraschi V, Marchetti C. Augmented reality for dental implantology: a pilot clinical report of two cases. BMC Oral Health 2019;19:158. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Meng T, Zhang X. Accuracy of intentionally tilted implant placement in the maxilla using dynamic navigation: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;51:552–557. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang J, Cui NH, Guo YJ, Zhang W. Navigation-guided extraction of impacted supernumerary teeth: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75: 1136.e1–1136. e5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hong YP, Kim CS. Intraoperative CT image-guided navigation system-assisted endoscopic enucleation of a mandibular odontogenic Keratocyst. Ear Nose Throat J 2019;98:NP144–NP146. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sukegawa S, Yoneda S, Kanno T, Tohmori H, Furuki Y. Optical surgical navigation-assisted removal of a foreign body using a splint to simplify the registration process: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2019;13:209. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Aydemir CA, Arısan V. Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020;31:255–263. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wei SM, Shi JY, Qiao SC, Zhang X, Lai HC, Zhang XM. Accuracy and primary stability of tapered or straight implants placed into fresh extraction socket using dynamic navigation: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2022;26:2733–2741. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Duque S, Gorrepati R, Kesavabhotla K, Huang C, Boockvar J. Endoscopic endonasal transphenoidal surgery using the BrainLAB® headband for navigation without rigid fixation. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2013;75:267–269. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.