EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 29 / No 1 (2023) J Oral Med Oral Surg, 29 1 (2023) 1 References
Open Access
Issue
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 29, Number 1, 2023
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2022032
Published online 24 January 2023
  1. Saputri RI, De Tobel J, Vranckx M, Ockerman A, Van Vlierberghe M, Fieuws S, et al. Is third molar development affected by third molar impaction or impaction-related parameters? Clin Oral Investig 2021;25:6681–6693. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carter K, Worthington S. Predictors of third molar impaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2016;95:267–276. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caillet J, Pereira B, Courtot R, Barthélémy I, Devoize L, Depeyre A. Ectopic third mandibular molar: evaluation of surgical practices and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2021;25:4781–4799. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang Y, Chen X, Zhou Z, Hao Y, Li H, Cheng Y, et al. Effects of impacted lower third molar extraction on periodontal tissue of the adjacent second molar. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2021;17:235–247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aniko-Włodarczyk M, Jaroń A, Preuss O, Grzywacz A, Trybek G. Evaluation of the effect of surgical extraction of an impacted mandibular third molar on the periodontal status of the second molar-prospective study. J Clin Med 2021;10:2655. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kindler S, Holtfreter B, Koppe T, Mksoud M, Lucas C, Seebauer C, et al. Third molars and periodontal damage of second molars in the general population. J Clin Periodontol 2018;45:1365–1374. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Guerrero ME, Botetano R, Beltran J, Horner K, Jacobs R. Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:335–342. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Erdil A, Akbulut N, Altan A, Demirsoy MS. Comparison of the effect of therapeutic elastic bandage, submucosal dexamethasone, or dexketoprofen trometamol on inflammatory symptoms and quality of life following third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2021;25:1849–1857. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Baqain ZH, Al-Shafii A, Hamdan AA, Sawair FA. Flap design and mandibular third molar surgery: a split mouth randomized clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:1020–1024. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Desai A, Patel R, Desai K, Vachhani NB, Shah KA, Sureja R. Comparison of two incision designs for surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar: A randomized comparative clinical study. Contemp Clin Dent 2014;5:170–174. [Google Scholar]
  11. Muñoz-Cámara D, Pardo-Zamora G, Camacho-Alonso F. Postoperative effects of intra-alveolar application of 0.2% chlorhexidine or 1% hyaluronic acid bioadhesive gels after mandibular third molar extraction: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2021;25:617–625. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yuan L, Gao J, Liu S, Zhao H. Does the lingual-based mucoperiosteal flap reduce postoperative morbidity compared with the Buccal-based mucoperiosteal flap after the surgical removal of impacted third molars? A meta-analysis review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021;79:1409–1421.e3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gröndahl HG, Lekholm U. Influence of mandibular third molars on related supporting tissues. Int J Oral Surg 1973;2:137–42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mudjono H, Rahajoe P-S, Astuti E-R-T. The effect of triangular and reversed triangular flap designs to post third molar odontectomy complications (a pilot study). J Clin Exp Dent 2020;12:e327–e334. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sridharan G, Nakkeeran KP, Andavan G, Raja VBKK. Effects of flap modification on third molar extraction outcomes − a randomised split mouth study. J Oral Biol Craniofacial Res 2020;10:619–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kugelberg CF. Periodontal healing two and four years after impacted lower third molar surgery. A comparative retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;19:341–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kugelberg CF, Ahlström U, Ericson S, Hugoson A, Thilander H. The influence of anatomical, pathophysiological and other factors on periodontal healing after impacted lower third molar surgery. A multiple regression analysis. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:37–43. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kan KW, Liu JKS, Lo ECM, Corbet EF, Leung WK. Residual periodontal defects distal to the mandibular second molar 6–36 months after impacted third molar extraction. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:1004–1011. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Van Swol RL, Mejias JE. Management and prevention of severe osseous defects distal to the second molar following third molar extraction. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1983;3:46–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Montevecchi M, Incerti Parenti S, Checchi V, Palumbo B, Checchi L, Alessandri Bonetti G. Periodontal healing after “orthodontic extraction” of mandibular third molars: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43:1137–1141. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bonetti GA, Parenti SI, Checchi L. Orthodontic extraction of mandibular third molar to avoid nerve injury and promote periodontal healing. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:719–723. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Toledano-Serrabona J, Ruiz-Romero V, Camps-Font O, Gay-Escoda C, Sánchez-Garcés M-Á. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of xenograft to prevent periodontal defects after mandibular third molar extraction. Med Oral Patol Oral Cirugia Bucal 2021;26:e414–e421. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Al-Hamed FS, Tawfik MA-M, Abdelfadil E, Al-Saleh MAQ. Efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin after mandibular third molar extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;75:1124–1135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dodson TB. Management of mandibular third molar extraction sites to prevent periodontal defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:1213–1224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Aimetti M, Pigella E, Romano F. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the effects of guided tissue regeneration using resorbable membranes after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007;27:51–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med 2021;18:e1003583. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Chandler J, Welch VA, Higgins JP, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;10:ED000142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019;366:l4898. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yusri S, Elfana A, Elbattawy W, Fawzy El-Sayed KM. Effect of locally delivered adjunctive antibiotics during surgical periodontal therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2021;25:5127–5138. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Silva JL, Jardim ECG, dos Santos PL, Pereira FP, Garcia Junior IR, Poi WR. Comparative analysis of 2-flap designs for extraction of mandibular third molar. J Craniofac Surg 2011;22:1003–1007. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Briguglio F, Zenobio EG, Isola G, Briguglio R, Briguglio E, Farronato D, et al. Complications in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars in relation to flap design: clinical and statistical evaluations. Quintessence Int Berl Ger 1985 2011;42:445–453. [Google Scholar]
  32. Korkmaz YT, Mollaoglu N, Ozmeriç N. Does laterally rotated flap design influence the short-term periodontal status of second molars and postoperative discomfort after partially impacted third molar surgery? J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;73:1031–1041. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Montero J, Mazzaglia G. Effect of removing an impacted mandibular third molar on the periodontal status of the mandibular second molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:2691–2697. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Stella PEM, Falci SGM, Oliveira de Medeiros LE, Douglas-de-Oliveira DW, Gonçalves PF, Flecha OD, et al. Impact of mandibular third molar extraction in the second molar periodontal status: a prospective study. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2017;21:285–290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Passarelli PC, Lajolo C, Pasquantonio G, D'Amato G, Docimo R, Verdugo F, et al. Influence of mandibular third molar surgical extraction on the periodontal status of adjacent second molars. J Periodontol 2019;90:847–855. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Faria AI, Gallas-Torreira M, López-Ratón M. Mandibular second molar periodontal healing after impacted third molar extraction in young adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:2732–2741. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pham TAV, Nguyen NH. Periodontal status of the adjacent second molar after impacted mandibular third molar surgical extraction. Contemp Clin Dent 2019;10:311–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Petsos H, Korte J, Eickholz P, Hoffmann T, Borchard R. Surgical removal of third molars and periodontal tissues of adjacent second molars. J Clin Periodontol 2016;43:453–460. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Baldini N, D'Elia C, Frati F, Cea P, Nappo A, Clementini M, et al. Trapezoidal flap vs envelope flap in mandibular third molar extraction. ORAL Implantol 2015;8:19–28. [Google Scholar]
  40. Risbaf Fakour S, Moghadam S, Naebi M. Comparison of probing depth in the distal surface of second molar following impacted mandibular third molar surgery with enveloped and triangular flaps. Gazzetta Medica Ital Arch Sci Mediche 2017;175. [Google Scholar]
  41. Tabrizi R, Arabion H, Gholami M. How will mandibular third molar surgery affect mandibular second molar periodontal parameters? Dent Res J 2013;10:523–526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ahmad M, Khan ZA, Khan TU, Alqutub MN, Mokeem SA, AlMubarak AM, et al. Influence of surgical flap design (envelope and szmyd) for removal of impacted mandibular third molars on clinical periodontal parameters: a clinical trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:4465. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Laurito D, Lollobrigida M, Graziani F, Guerra F, Vestri A, De Biase A. Periodontal effects of a transposed versus a conventional flap in mandibular third molar extractions. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27:708–711. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Alqahtani NA, Khaleelahmed S, Desai F. Evaluation of two flap designs on the mandibular second molar after third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol JOMFP 2017;21:317–318. [Google Scholar]
  45. Dicus-Brookes C, Partrick M, Blakey GH, Faulk-Eggleston J, Offenbacher S, Phillips C, et al. Removal of symptomatic third molars may improve periodontal status of remaining dentition. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;71:1639–1646. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mudjono H, Rahajoe P-S, Astuti E-R-T. The effect of triangular and reversed triangular flap designs to post third molar odontectomy complications (a pilot study). J Clin Exp Dent 2020;12:e327–e334. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ottria L, Luciani F, Piva P, Alagna AM, Arcuri C, Bartuli FN. The flap recovery on the impacted lower third molar surgery comparing 3 different flap designs: a clinical study. ORAL Implantol 2017;10:270–275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kim H-R, Choi B-H, Engelke W, Serrano D, Xuan F, Mo D-Y. A comparative study on the extractions of partially impacted mandibular third molars with or without a buccal flap: a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:966–970. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Church H, Dolby AE. The effect of age on the cellular immune response to dento-gingival plaque extract. J Periodontal Res 1978;13:120–126. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Blakey GH, Parker DW, Hull DJ, White RP, Offenbacher S, Phillips C, et al. Impact of removal of asymptomatic third molars on periodontal pathology. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:245–250. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Peng KY, Tseng YC, Shen EC, Chiu SC, Fu E, Huang YW. Mandibular second molar periodontal status after third molar extraction. J Periodontol 2001;72:1647–1651. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. White RP, Madianos PN, Offenbacher S, Phillips C, Blakey GH, Haug RH, et al. Microbial complexes detected in the second/third molar region in patients with asymptomatic third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:1234–1240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. White RP, Phillips C, Hull DJ, Offenbacher S, Blakey GH, Haug RH. Risk markers for periodontal pathology over time in the third molar and non-third molar regions in young adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:749–754. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ramírez V, Marró P, López R. Effect of mechanical debridement on distal periodontal aspects of second molars after the extraction of third molars: a systematic review. J Periodontol 2012;83:595–601. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Bailey E, Kashbour W, Shah N, Worthington HV, Renton TF, Coulthard P. Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;7:CD004345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Steel BJ, Surendran KSB, Braithwaite C, Mehta D, Keith DJW. Current thinking in lower third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;60:257–265. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Monaco G, Daprile G, Tavernese L, Corinaldesi G, Marchetti C. Mandibular third molar removal in young patients: an evaluation of 2 different flap designs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:15–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Chaves AJP, Nascimento LR, Costa MEG, Franz-Montan M, Oliveira-Júnior PA, Groppo FC. Effects of surgical removal of mandibular third molar on the periodontium of the second molar. Int J Dent Hyg 2008;6:123–128. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Kirtiloğlu T, Bulut E, Sümer M, Cengiz I. Comparison of 2 flap designs in the periodontal healing of second molars after fully impacted mandibular third molar extractions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:2206–2210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  60. Stephens RJ, App GR, Foreman DW. Periodontal evaluation of two mucoperiosteal flaps used in removing impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983;41:719–724. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Quee TA, Gosselin D, Millar EP, Stamm JW. Surgical removal of the fully impacted mandibular third molar. The influence of flap design and alveolar bone height on the periodontal status of the second molar. J Periodontol 1985;56:625–630. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Rosa AL, Carneiro MG, Lavrador MA, Novaes AB. Influence of flap design on periodontal healing of second molars after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:404–407. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Man-Son-Hing M, Laupacis A, O'Rourke K, Molnar FJ, Mahon J, Chan KBY, et al. Determination of the clinical importance of study results. J Gen Intern Med 2002;17:469–476. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lesaffre E, Philstrom B, Needleman I, Worthington H. The design and analysis of split-mouth studies: what statisticians and clinicians should know. Stat Med 2009;28:3470–3482. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.