Open Access
Educational Article
Issue
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 27, Number 4, 2021
Article Number 54
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2021034
Published online 11 November 2021
  1. Petersilge CA. Fundamentals of enterprise photodocumentation: connecting the clinical and technical − a review of key concepts. J Digit Imag 2019;32:1052–1061. [Google Scholar]
  2. Djian J, Lellouch AG, Botter C, Levy J, Burgun A, Hivelin M, et al. Photographie clinique par smartphone en chirurgie plastique et protection des données personnelles: développement d'une plateforme sécurisée et application sur 979 patients. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2019;64:33–43. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ettorre G, Weber M, Schaaf H, Lowry JC, Mommaerts MY, Howaldt H-P. Standards for digital photography in cranio-maxillo-facial surgery − Part I: Basic views and guidelines. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006;34:65–73. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wander P. Clinical dental photography in orthodontic practice. Prim Dent J 2016;5:38–44. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sharland M. Clinical Photography: A Self Help Guide: Clinical Photographs can form a Useful Tool for the Dental Team. Mike Sharland Offers Advice on Equipment Selection and Settings Recommended for High Quality, Predictable Images. Primary Dental Journal [Internet]. 2018 [cité 16 nov 2020]; Disponible sur: https://journals-sagepub-com.rproxy.sc.univ-paris-diderot.fr/doi/10.1177/205016841800700206?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_ id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed [Google Scholar]
  6. Terry DA, Snow SR, McLaren EA. Contemporary dental photography: selection and application. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008;29:432–436. [Google Scholar]
  7. Loiacono P, Pascoletti L. La photographie en odontologie: théorie et pratique pour une documentation moderne. Paris: Quintessence International; 2011;xiii+333. [Google Scholar]
  8. Alande C, Rochefort J, Tanguy C, Fenelon M, Campana F, Fricain J-C. On the value of smartphone photographs for oral mucosal disorders. Ann Dermatolog Vénéréolog 2021;148:45–46. [Google Scholar]
  9. Awadallah M, Idle M, Patel K, Kademani D. Management update of potentially premalignant oral epithelial lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2018;125:628–636. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zadik Y, Orbach H, Panzok A, Smith Y, Czerninski R. Evaluation of oral mucosal diseases: inter- and intra-observer analyses. J Oral Pathol Med 2012;41:68–72. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lecerf J, Plard H, Tirlet G. La photographie en odontologie: des bases fondamentales à la clinique: objectifs, matériels et conseils pratiques. Malakoff: Éditions CdP; 2017. xv+95. (Guide Clinique). [Google Scholar]
  12. Ruhstaller T, Roe H, Thürlimann B, Nicoll JJ. The multidisciplinary meeting: an indispensable aid to communication between different specialities. Eur J Cancer 2006;42:2459–2462. [Google Scholar]
  13. OncoPaca-Corse. Charte régionale des RCP | Réseau Régional de Cancérologie OncoPaca-Corse [Internet]. 2019 [cité 19 juin 2019]. Disponible sur: http://www.oncopaca.org/fr/page/charte- regionale-des-RCP-concertation-pluridisciplinaire [Google Scholar]
  14. Briscoe MH. Preparing scientific illustrations: a guide to better posters, presentations, and publications. New York: Springer 1996. xii+204. [Google Scholar]
  15. Czerninski R, Zaidman B, Keshet N, Hamburger J, Zini A. Clinical photography: Attitudes among dental students in two dental institutions. Eur J Dent Educ 2019. [Google Scholar]
  16. Walsh T, Liu JL, Brocklehurst P, Glenny A-M., Lingen M, Kerr AR, et al. Clinical assessment to screen for the detection of oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in apparently healthy adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;1–17. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ministère des affaires sociales de la santé et des droits des femmes. Programme National de Réduction du Tabagisme 2014-2019 [Internet]. 2014 [cité 2 aoÛt 2019]. Disponible sur: https://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/PNRT2014-2019.pdf [Google Scholar]
  18. Parlement européen, Conseil de l'Union Européenne. Directive 2014 /40/UE [Internet]. Journal officiel de l'Union européenne. 2014 [cité 2 aoÛt 2019]. Disponible sur: https://eur-lex.,europa.,eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32014L0040 [Google Scholar]
  19. Brinker TJ, Hekler A, Enk AH, Berking C, Haferkamp S, Hauschild A, et al. Deep neural networks are superior to dermatologists in melanoma image classification. Eur J Cancer 2019;119:11–17. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kanatas AN, Fisher SE, Lowe D, Ong TK, Mitchell DA, Rogers SN. The configuration of clinics and the use of biopsy and photography in oral premalignancy: a survey of consultants of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Br J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 2011;49:99–105. [Google Scholar]
  21. Marley JJ, Linden GJ, Cowan CG, Lamey P-J., Johnson NW, Warnakulasuriya KS, et al. A comparison of the management of potentially malignant oral mucosal lesions by oral medicine practitioners and oral & maxillofacial surgeons in the UK. J Oral Pathol Med 1998;27:489–95. [Google Scholar]
  22. Roume M, Azogui-Levy S, Lescaille G, Descroix V, Rochefort J. Knowledge and practices of dentists in France regarding oral mucosal diseases: a national survey. J Oral Med Oral Surg 2019;25:10. [Google Scholar]
  23. Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL). Guide pratique sur la protection des données personnelles [Internet]. 2018 [cité 9 juill 2019]. Disponible sur: https://www.cnil.fr/sites/default/files/atoms/files/guide-cnom-cnil.pdf [Google Scholar]
  24. Payne KF, Tahim A, Goodson AM, Delaney M, Fan K. A review of current clinical photography guidelines in relation to smartphone publishing of medical images. J Vis Commun Med 2012;35:188–192. [Google Scholar]
  25. Palacios-González C. The ethics of clinical photography and social media. Med Health Care Philos 2015;18:63–70. [Google Scholar]
  26. Nguyen TT, VanderWalde L, Bellavance E, Eisenhauer T, Hieken T, Johnson N, et al. Ethical considerations of medical photography in the management of breast disease. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25:2801–6. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kunde L, McMeniman E, Parker M. Clinical photography in dermatology: ethical and medico-legal considerations in the age of digital and smartphone technology. Aust J Dermatol 2013;54:192–197. [Google Scholar]
  28. Conseil National de l'Ordre des Médecins (CNOM). Echange et partage d'informations [Internet]. 2016 [cité 9 juill 2019]. Disponible sur: https://www.conseil-national.medecin.fr/sites/default/files/external-package/fiche_pratique/y5ko8l/cnomechangepartageinfos.pdf [Google Scholar]
  29. Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL). Sécurité: Chiffrer, garantir l'intégrité ou signer | CNIL [Internet]. 2018 [cité 9 juill 2019]. Disponible sur: https://www.cnil.fr/fr/securite-chiffrer-garantir-lintegrite-ou-signer [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.