EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 23 / No 1 (Janvier 2017) Med Buccale Chir Buccale, 23 1 (2017) 65-71 References
Open Access
Issue
Med Buccale Chir Buccale
Volume 23, Number 1, Janvier 2017
Page(s) 65 - 71
Section Article pédagogique / Educational article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2016045
Published online 31 January 2017
  1. Warner ME, Benenfeld SM, Warner MA, Schroeder DR, Maxson PM. Perianesthetic dental injuries: frequency, outcomes and risk factors. Anesthesiology 1999;90:1302-1305. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hacquard A, Rogez F, Delahaye L, Dovergne A, Lelièvre J, Boisramé-Gastrin S. Complications during prolonged oro-tracheal intubation: literature review and two case reports. Med Buccale Chir Buccale 2011;17:315-321. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. Owen H, Waddell-Smith I. Dental trauma associated with anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 2000;28(2):133-145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation en collaboration avec la Société française d’oto-rhino-laryngologie. Conférence de consensus 2002. Elsevier, Paris, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  5. Skeie A, Schwartz O. Traumatic injuries of the teeth in connection with general anaesthesia and the effect of use of mouthguards. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999;15(1):33-36. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rapport du conseil médical du Sou Médical-groupe MACSF sur le risque médical. Chiffres 2014. Édition 2015. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gerson C, Sicot C. Dental accidents in relation to general anesthesia. Experience of mutual medical insurance group. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1997;16(7):918-921. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Crosby ET, Cooper RM, Douglas MJ, Doyle DJ, Hung OR, Labrecque P, et al. The unanticipated difficult airway with recommendations for management. Can J Anaesth 1998;45(8):757-776. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nouette-Gaulain K, Lenfant F, Jacquet-Francillon D, Belbachir A, Bournigault-Nuquet A, Choquet O, et al. French clinical guidelines for prevention of perianaesthesic dental injuries : long text. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2012;31(3):213-223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Newland MC, Ellis SJ, Peters KR, Simonson JA, Durham TM, Ullrich FA. Dental injury associated with anesthesia: a report of 161,687 anesthesics given over 14 years. J Clin Anesth 2007;19(5):339-345. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sousa JM, Mourão JI. Tooth injury in anaesthesiology. Braz J Anesthesiol 2015;65(6):511-518. [Google Scholar]
  12. Mańka-Malara K, Gawlak D, Hovhannisyan A, Klikowska M, Kostrzewa-Janicka J. Dental trauma prevention during endotracheal intubation--review of literature. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 2015;47(4):425-429. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Feltracco P, Gaudio RM, Barbieri S, Tiano L, Iacobone M, Viel G, et al. The perils of dental vacation: possible anaesthetic and medicolegal consequences. Med Sci Law 2013;53(1):19-23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Itoman EM, Kajioka EH, Yamamoto LG. Dental fracture risk of metal vs plastic laryngoscope blades in dental models. Am J Emerg Med 2005;23(2):186-189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mourão J, Neto J, Luís C, Moreno C, Barbosa J, Carvalho J, et al. Dental injury after conventional direct laryngoscopy: a prospective observational study. Anaesthesia 2013;68(10):1059-1065. [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Macintosh RR. A new laryngoscope. Lancet 1943;1:205. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jephcott A. The Macintosh laryngoscope. A historical note on its clinical and commercial development. Anaesthesia 1984;39(5): 474-479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lockhart PB, Feldbau EV, Gabel RA, Connolly SF, Silversin JB. Dental complications during and after tracheal intubation. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112(4):480-483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shorten GD, Roberts JT. Some applications of fiberoptics in anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 1991;9:187-193. [Google Scholar]
  20. Weiss M, Schwarz U, Dillier CM, Gerber AC. Teaching and supervising tracheal intubation in paediatric patients using videolaryngoscopy. Paediatr Anaesth 2001;11:343-348. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gómez-Ríos MA, Pinegger S, CarrilloMantilla M, Vizcaino L, Barreto-Calvo P, Paech MJ, et al. A randomised crossover trial comparing the Airtraq® NT, McGrath® MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation of simulated easy and difficult airways in a manikin. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2016;66(3):289-297. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu ZJ, Yi J, Guo WJ, Ma C, Huang YG. Comparison of McGrath Series 3 and Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in patients with normal airway by inexperienced anesthetists. A Randomized Study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95(2):e2514. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hyuga S, Sekiguchi T, Ishida T, Yamamoto K, Sugiyama Y, Kawamata M. Successful tracheal intubation with the McGRATH® MAC videolaryngoscope after failure with the Pentax-AWSTM in a patient with cervical spine immobilization. Can J Anaesth 2012;59(12):1154-1155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee RA, Van Zundert AA, Maassen RL, Wieringa PA. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors by video laryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012;56(2): 224-229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wetsch WA, Carlitscheck M, Spelten O, Teschendorf P, Hellmich M, Genzwürker HV, et al. Succes rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five videolaryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011;28(12):849-858. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Williams D, Ball DR. Palatal perforation associated with McGRATH® videolaryngoscope. Anaesthesia 2009;64(10):1144-1145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shippey B, Ray D, McKeown D. Use of the McGRATH® videolaryngoscope in management of difficult and failed intubation. Br J Anaesth 2008;100(1):116-119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ng I, Sim XL, Williams D, Segal R. A randomised controlled trial comparing the McGRATH® videolaryngoscope with the straight blade laryngoscope when used in adult patients with potential difficult airways. Anaesthesia 2011;66(8):709-714. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hoshijima H, Kurutani N, Hirabayashi Y, Takeuchi R, Shiga T, Masaki E. Pentax airway scopeTM vs Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2014;69(8):911-918. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ruetzler K, Imach S, Weiss M, Haas T, Schmidt AR. Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy: Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer. Anaesthesist 2015;64(7):513-519. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hurford DM, White MC. A comparison of the Glidescope and Karl Storz DCI videolaryngoscopes in a paediatric manikin. Anaesthesia 2010;65(8):781-784. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Maldini B, Hodžović I, Goranović T, Mesarić J. Challenges in the use of videolaryngoscops. Acta Clin Croat (Suppl. 1) 2016;55:41-50. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.