Open Access
Med Buccale Chir Buccale
Volume 21, Number 3, juillet 2015
Page(s) 141 - 147
Section Article pédagogique / Educational article
Published online 29 June 2015
  1. Hämmerle CH, Araújo MG, Simion M. Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets. Consensus Group 2011. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23 Suppl 5:80-2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2014;93(10):950-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, Figuero E, Martin C, Sanz M. Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23 Suppl 5:22-38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Vittorini Orgeas G, Clementini M, De Risi V, de Sanctis M. Surgical techniques for alveolar socket preservation: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28(4):1049-61. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vanhoutte V, et al. A methodological approach to assessing alveolar ridge preservation procedures in humans: soft tissue profile. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25(3):304-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Girish Rao S, et al. Bone regeneration in extraction sockets with autologous platelet rich fibrin gel. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2013;12(1):11-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Alonso N, Tanikawa DY, Freitas Rda S, Canan L Jr, Ozawa TO, Rocha DL. Evaluation of maxillary alveolar reconstruction using a resorbable collagen sponge with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in cleft lip and palate patients. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2010;16(5):1183-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Perelman-Karmon M, Kozlovsky A, Liloy R, Artzi Z. Socket site preservation using bovine bone mineral with and without a bioresorbable collagen membrane. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012;32(4):459-65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L, Cardaropoli G. Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane: a randomized controlled clinical trial with histologic analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012;32(4):421-30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sanz M, Cecchinato D, Ferrus J, Pjetursson EB, Lang NP, Lindhe J. A prospective, randomized-controlled clinical trial to evaluate bone preservation using implants with different geometry placed into extraction sockets in the maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21(1):13-21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Irinakis T, Wiebe C. Initial torque stability of a new bone condensing dental implant. A cohort study of 140 consecutively placed implants. J Oral Implantol 2009;35(6):277-82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kielbassa AM, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing a variable-thread novel tapered and a standard tapered implant: interim one-year results. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101(5):293-305. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25(2):113-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Yoshino S, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Lozada JL. Effects of connective tissue grafting on the facial gingival level following single immediate implantplacement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone: a 1-year randomized controlled prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29(2):432-40. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Di Alberti L, et al. Clinical and mechanical evaluation of screw-retained implant-supported zirconia restorations. A 36 months prospective clinical study. Minerva Stomatol 2013;11. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.