Open Access
Table III
Analysis of risk of bias and level of evidence according to the ROBINS-I, the RoB 2.0, and CEBM Oxford level of evidence classification. Red: high risk of bias, orange: moderate risk of bias, green: low risk of bias, white: not applicable.
| Bias due to confounding | Bias arising from measurement of the exposure | Bias in selection of participation | Bias due to post-exposure intervention | Bias due to missing data | Bias arising from measurement of the outcome | Bias in selection of the reported result | Level of evidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bafijari 2019 |  |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
3 |
| Faot 2019 | |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
3 |
| García 2011 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Gehrke 2014 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Guirado 2015 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Guler 2013 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Hadzik 2017 | |
|
|
|
|
|
3 | |
| Hakobyan 2020 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Karl 2008 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Krafft 2015 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Kramer 2005 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Makary 2012 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Mei 2022 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Möhlhenrich 2016 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Morales 2012 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Pieri 2012 | |
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
| Queiroz 2015 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Saracoglu 2015 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Shokri 2013 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
| Sreerama 2021 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Støre 2011 | |
|
|
|
|
|
3 | |
| Sun 2016 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Tözüm 2016 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| Velloso 2019 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
| Waechter 2017 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.