Issue |
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 30, Number 4, 2024
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 24 | |
Number of page(s) | 11 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2024034 | |
Published online | 02 December 2024 |
Original Research Article
Immediate extraction-implantation and provisionalization (IIP): Esthetic evaluation of IIP surgical protocols via the Pink Esthetic Score: a retrospective cross-sectional study of 39 implants
Rennes 1 University, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France
* Correspondence: sylianecoiffic@gmail.com
Received:
4
June
2023
Accepted:
21
October
2024
A general protocol has been accepted by the scientific community for using the extraction immediate implantation and provisionalization (EIIP), in the replacement a compromised tooth in the antero-maxillary region, but the multiplicity of biomaterials used leads to diversity of application of the protocol. The aims of this study were to compare the Pink esthetic Score (PES) according to the EIIP protocol, evaluate abutment visibility according to surgical protocol, and assess whether the type of tooth rehabilitated had an impact on PES or abutment visibility. A retrospective study evaluating the PES of 39 implants in 3 treatment units compared the esthetic results of surgical techniques (xenogeneic graft, alloplastic, PRF, connective tissue graft, membrane) after the crown had been in use for at least 3 weeks. When indicated, EIIP treatment appears to be the treatment's choice for the management of compromised teeth in the antero-maxillary region, whatever the biomaterial used in the protocol (xenogeneic graft, platelet-rich fibrin, connective tissue graft, membrane, alloplastic substitute). Each of the PES observed was rated as “acceptable”, and no statistical differences were found in the study between biomaterials, tooth situation (central or lateral) or abutment visibility.
Key words: Dental implant / tooth extraction / oral surgery / esthetic surgery / immediate dental replacement
© The authors, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.