EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 31 / No 4 (2025) J Oral Med Oral Surg, 31 4 (2025) 30 References
Open Access
Issue
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 31, Number 4, 2025
Article Number 30
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2025026
Published online 24 October 2025
  1. Juodzbalys G, Stumbras A, Goyushov S, Duruel O, Tözüm TF. Morphological classification of extraction sockets and clinical decision tree for socket preservation/augmentation after tooth extraction: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2019;10:e3. [Google Scholar]
  2. Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KWO, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2014;93:950–958. [Google Scholar]
  3. Araújo MG, Silva CO, Misawa M, Sukekava F. Alveolar socket healing: what can we learn? Periodontol 2000 2015;68:122–134. [Google Scholar]
  4. Stumbras A, Kuliesius P, Januzis G, Juodzbalys G. Alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction using different bone graft materials and autologous platelet concentrates: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofacial Res 2019;10:e2. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jeffcoat MK. Bone loss in the oral cavity. J Bone Miner Res 1993; 2:S467–S473. [Google Scholar]
  6. Avila-Ortiz G, Chambrone L, Vignoletti F. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2019;46:195–223. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kao ST, Scott DD. A review of bone substitutes. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2007;19:513–521. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mihaylova Z, Mitev V, Stanimirov P, Isaeva A, Gateva N, Ishkitiev N. Use of platelet concentrates in oral and maxillofacial surgery: an overview. Acta Odontol Scand 2017;75:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  9. Schmidt AH. Autologous bone graft: is it still the gold standard? Injury 2021;52:S18–S22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bernardi S, Macchiarelli G, Bianchi S. Autologous materials in regenerative dentistry: harvested bone, platelet concentrates and dentin derivates. Molecules 2020;25:5330. [Google Scholar]
  11. Patel D, Tatum SA. Bone graft substitutes and enhancement in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Facial Plast Surg 2023;39:556–563. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kumar P, Fathima G, Vinitha B. Bone grafts in dentistry. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2013;5:S125– S127. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fillingham Y, Jacobs J. Bone grafts and their substitutes. Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:6–9. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wickramasinghe ML, Dias GJ, Premadasa KMGP. A novel classification of bone graft materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2022;110:1724–1749. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kokubo T, Kim H-M, Kawashita M. Novel bioactive materials with different mechanical properties. Biomaterials 2003;24:2161–2175. [Google Scholar]
  16. Canceill T, Kichenbrand C, Joniot S, Moby V. Les substituts osseux en odontologie − Partie 1. BioMatériaux Cliniques 2018;3:46–51. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sharma A, Minh Duc NT, Luu Lam Thang T, Hai Nam N, Ng SJ, Abbas KS, Tuy NT. A consensus-based checklist for reporting of survey studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med 2021;36:3179–3187. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jordana F, Le Visage C, Weiss P. Bone substitutes]. Med Sci (Paris) 2017;33:60–65. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sculean A, Nikolidakis D, Nikou G, Ivanovic A, Chapple ILC, Stavropoulos A. Biomaterials for promoting periodontal regeneration in human intrabony defects: a systematic review. Periodontol 2000 2015;68:182–216. [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu K, Huang Z, Chen Z, Han B, Ouyang X. Treatment of periodontal intrabony defects using bovine porous bone mineral and guided tissue regeneration with/without platelet‐rich fibrin: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 2021;92:1546–1553. [Google Scholar]
  21. Aithal A, Aithal PS. Development and validation of survey questionnaire & experimental data − a systematical review-based statistical approach. Int J Management Technol Soc Sci 2020;5:233–251. [Google Scholar]
  22. Voutilainen A, Pitkäaho T, Kvist T, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K. How to ask about patient satisfaction? The visual analogue scale is less vulnerable to confounding factors and ceiling effect than a symmetric Likert scale. J Adv Nurs 2016;72:946–957. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fleming E, Neville P, Muirhead VE. Are there more women in the dentist workforce? Using an intersectionality lens to explore the feminization of the dentist workforce in the UK and US. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2023;51:365–372. [Google Scholar]
  24. Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research-“Blue Highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 2007;297: 403–406. [Google Scholar]
  25. Concannon TW, Guise J-M, Dolor RJ, Meissner P, Tunis S, Krishnan JA, Pace WD, Saltz J, Hersh WR, Michener L, Carey TS. A national strategy to develop pragmatic clinical trials infrastructure. Clin Transl Sci 2014;7:164–171. [Google Scholar]
  26. Canceill T, Monsarrat P, Faure-Clement E, Tohme M, Vergnes JN, Grosgogeat B. Dental practice-based research networks (D-PBRN) worldwide: a scoping review. J Dent 2021;104:103523. [Google Scholar]
  27. Boussouni S, Sylvain G, Babajko S, Radoi L, Taihi I. French Dentists' knowledge, attitudes and practices toward oral cancer detection: a national survey. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2025;126:102072. [Google Scholar]
  28. Brun A, Lounes S, Chen C, Dursun E. Attitudes of general and specialist French practitioners toward stage III-IV grade C periodontitis with familial aggregation. J Oral Sci 2024;66:254–257. [Google Scholar]
  29. Loiseau A, Davit-Béal T, Brézulier D. Are protective measures against Covid-19 still active in orthodontic practices? A cross-sectional online survey of French orthodontists three years on from the pandemic. PLoS ONE 2024;19:e0307453. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.