EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 30 / No 3 (2024) J Oral Med Oral Surg, 30 3 (2024) 36 References
Open Access
Issue
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 30, Number 3, 2024
Article Number 36
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2024029
Published online 21 January 2025
  1. Sugawara J, Daimaruya T, Umemori M, Nagasaka H, Takahashi I, Kawamura H, et al. Distal movement of mandibular molars in adult patients with the skeletal anchorage system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:130–138. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Melsen B, Verna C. Anchorage problems. In: Melsen B, Ed. Adult Orthod., West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2013, p. 132–62. [Google Scholar]
  3. Melsen B, Godtfredsen Laursen M. Have TADs changed the role of the orthodontist in the rehabilitation of the degenerated dentition? J Dent Craniofacial Res 2017;02:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bassigny F, Chillès D, Chillès J-G., Dumoulin B, Filippi R, Le Gall M, et al. Nouvelles conceptions de l'ancrage en orthodontie. CdP, Vol. 1, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  5. Depeyre A, Carlier A, Filippi R, Cresseaux P. Abalakov technique for global mandibular distalisation: technical note. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;60:209–210. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chastanet S, Louisy A, Bonnin F, Kulker D, Laure B. Abalakov: Posterior mandibular anchorage technique for orthodontic treatment. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;121:575–578. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bernard-Granger C, Cresseaux P, Filippi R. Enfin du nouveau dans l'ancrage mandibulaire postérieur. Rev Orthopédie Dento-Faciale 2018;52:65–80. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pernier C, Cresseaux P. Presurgical orthodontic preparation of skeletal Class II by means of a bone anchorage with an osteosynthesis wire: a clinical case. Orthod Fr 2021;92:17–28. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cresseaux P, Filippi R. Quand l'alpinisme vient révolutionner l'ancrage orthodontique. ID 2017;6:40–47. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wagner L. Recul mandibulaire en masse par fils d'ostéosynthèse: une étude de cohorte. UNIVERSITÉ CLAUDE BERNARD-LYON I.U F.F.R. D'ODONTOLOGIE, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. Takaki T, Tamura N, Yamamoto M, Takano N, Shibahara T, Yasumura T, et al. Clinical study of temporary anchorage devices for orthodontic treatment. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2010;51:151–163. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jing Z, Wu Y, Jiang W, Zhao L, Jing D, Zhang N, et al. Factors affecting the clinical success rate of miniscrew implants for orthodontic treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:835–841. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu T-Y, Kuang S-H, Wu C-H. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:1595–1599. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Azeem M, Saleem MM, Liaquat A, Ul Haq A, Ul Hamid W, Masood M. Failure rates of mini-implants inserted in the retromolar area. Int Orthod 2019;17: 53–59. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. De Clerck EEB, Swennen GRJ. Success rate of miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction. Angle Orthod 2011;81: 1010–1013. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Oh Y-H, Park H-S, Kwon T-G. Treatment effects of microimplant-aided sliding mechanics on distal retraction of posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:470–481. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ye C, Zhihe Z, Zhao Q, Ye J. Treatment effects of distal movement of lower arch with miniscrews in the retromolar area compared with miniscrews in the posterior area of the maxillary. J Craniofac Surg 2013;24:1974. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Aly SA, Alyan D, Fayed MS, Alhammadi MS, Mostafa YA. Success rates and factors associated with failure of temporary anchorage devices: a prospective clinical trial. J Investig Clin Dent 2018;9:e12331. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Alharbi F, Almuzian M, Bearn D. Miniscrews failure rate in orthodontics: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2018;40:519–530. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rodriguez JC, Suarez F, Chan H-L, Padial-Molina M, Wang H-L. Implants for orthodontic anchorage: success rates and reasons of failures. Implant Dent 2014;23:155–161. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Park H-S, Lee S-K, Kwon O-W. Group distal movement of teeth using microscrew implant anchorage. Angle Orthod 2005;75:602–609. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Papageorgiou SN, Zogakis IP, Papadopoulos MA. Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:577–595.e7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim J-W, Lee N-K, Sim H-Y, Yun P-Y, Lee J-H. Failure of orthodontic mini-implants by patient age, sex, and arch; number of primary insertions; and frequency of reinsertions after failure: an analysis of the implant failure rate and patient failure rate. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2016;36:559–565. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gurdan Z, Szalma J. Evaluation of the success and complication rates of self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants. Niger J Clin Pract 2018;21:546–552. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yeon BM, Lee N-K, Park JH, Kim JM, Kim S-H, Kook Y-A. Comparison of treatment effects after total mandibular arch distalization with miniscrews vs ramal plates in patients with Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop Off Publ Am Assoc Orthod Its Const Soc Am Board Orthod 2022;161:529–536. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim YB, Bayome M, Park JH, Lim HJ, Mo S-S, Lee NK, et al. Displacement of mandibular dentition during total arch distalization according to locations and types of TSADs: 3D Finite element analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res 2019;22:46–52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Yu J, Park JH, Bayome M, Kim S, Kook Y-A, Kim Y, et al. Treatment effects of mandibular total arch distalization using a ramal plate. Korean J Orthod 2016;46:212–219. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dumitrache M, Gabison K, Atrtchine A, Chabre C. Trois analyses céphalométriques usuelles. Elsevier Masson, 2013. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.