EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 26 / No 1 (2020) J Oral Med Oral Surg, 26 1 (2020) 1 References
Open Access
Issue
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 26, Number 1, 2020
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 7
Section Article original / Original article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2019031
Published online 23 December 2019
  1. Al-Moraissi EA, Dahan AA, Alwadeai MS, et al. What surgical treatment has the lowest recurrence rate following the management of keratocystic odontogenic tumor?: A large systematic review and meta-analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017;45:131–144. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Speight PM, Takata T. New tumour entities in the 4th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck tumours: odontogenic and maxillofacial bone tumours. Virchows Arch 2018;472:331–339. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Karhade DS, Afshar S, Padwa BL. What is the prevalence of undiagnosed nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome in children with an odontogenic keratocyst? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. Leung YY, Lau SL, Tsoi KY, Ma HL, Ng CL. Results of the treatment of keratocystic odontogenic tumours using enucleation and treatment of the residual bony defect with Carnoy's solution. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45:1154–1158. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vargas PA, da Cruz Perez DE, Mata GM, de Almeida OP, Jones AV, Gerhard R. Fine needle aspiration cytology as an additional tool in the diagnosis of odontogenic keratocyst. Cytopathology 2007;18:361–366. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chrcanovic BR, Gomez RS. Recurrence probability for keratocystic odontogenic tumors: an analysis of 6427 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2017;45:244–251. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ribeiro-Junior O, Borba AM, Alves CAF, Gouveia MM, Deboni MCZ, Naclerio-Homem MDG. Reclassification and treatment of odontogenic keratocysts: A cohort study. Braz Oral Res 2017;31:e98. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mendes RA, Carvalho JF, van der Waal I. Characterization and management of the keratocystic odontogenic tumor in relation to its histopathological and biological features. Oral Oncol 2010;46:219–225. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sharif FN, Oliver R, Sweet C, Sharif MO. Interventions for the treatment of keratocystic odontogenic tumours. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:Cd008464. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Antonoglou GN, Sandor GK, Koidou VP, Papageorgiou SN. Non-syndromic and syndromic keratocystic odontogenic tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis of recurrences. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014;42:e364–e371. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaczmarzyk T, Mojsa I, Stypulkowska J. A systematic review of the recurrence rate for keratocystic odontogenic tumour in relation to treatment modalities. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:756–767. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Noy D, Rachmiel A, Zar K, Emodi O, Nagler RM. Sporadic versus syndromic keratocysts − can we predict treatment outcome? A review of 102 cysts. Oral Dis 2017;23:1058–1065. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ribeiro Junior O, Borba AM, Alves CAF, de Guoveia MM, Coracin FL, Guimaraes Junior J. Keratocystic odontogenic tumors and Carnoy's solution: results and complications assessment. Oral Dis 2012;18:548–557. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Berge TI, Helland SB, Saelen A, et al. Pattern of recurrence of nonsyndromic keratocystic odontogenic tumors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016;122:10–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Martins WD, Fávaro DM. Recurrence of an ameloblastoma in an autogenous iliac bone graft. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:657–659. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stoelinga PJ. The treatment of odontogenic keratocysts by excision of the overlying, attached mucosa, enucleation, and treatment of the bony defect with carnoy solution. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1662–1666. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Covello P, Buchbinder D. Recent trends in the treatment of benign odontogenic tumors. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;24:343–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cunha JF, Gomes CC, de Mesquita RA, Andrade Goulart EM, de Castro WH, Gomez RS. Clinicopathologic features associated with recurrence of the odontogenic keratocyst: a cohort retrospective analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2016;121:629–635. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Naruse T, Yamashita K, Yanamoto S, et al. Histopathological and immunohistochemical study in keratocystic odontogenic tumors: predictive factors of recurrence. Oncol Lett 2017;13:3487–3493. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. August M, Faquin WC, Troulis M, Kaban LB. Differentiation of odontogenic keratocysts from nonkeratinizing cysts by use of fine-needle aspiration biopsy and cytokeratin-10 staining. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:935–40; discussion 40-41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Padilla R, Murrah V. The potential for sampling error in incisional biopsies of odontogenic keratocysts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2004;98:202. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen S, Forman M, Sadow PM, August M. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Incisional Biopsy in the Oral Cavity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74:959–964. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Desai KM, Angadi PV, Kale AD, Hallikerimath S. Assessment of cell block technique in head and neck pathology diagnoses: A preliminary study. Diagn Cytopathol 2019;47:445–451. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rivero ER, Grando LJ, de Oliveira Ramos G, da Silva Belatto MF, Daniel FI. Utility of cell block in cytological preoperative diagnosis of keratocystic odontogenic tumour. Pathol Res Pract 2014;210:224–227. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.