Open Access
Med Buccale Chir Buccale
Volume 18, Number 1, février 2012
Page(s) 60 - 77
Section Recommandations / Recommendations
Published online 14 February 2012
  1. European Commission. Radiation protection 125: Low dose ionizing radiation and cancer risk. Office for official publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  2. European Commission. Radiation protection 136: European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology. Office for official publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  3. European Commission. Radiation protection 88: Recommendations for the implementation of Title VII of the european basic safety standards (BSS) directive concerning significant increase in exposure due to natural radiation sources. Office for official publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  4. Faccioli N, Barillari M, Guariglia S, Zivelonghi E, Rizzotti A, Cerini R, Pozzi Mucelli R. Radiation dose saving through the use of cone-beam CT in hearing-impaired patients. Radiologia Medica 2009;114:1308-18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Garcia Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008a;133:640,e1-5. [Google Scholar]
  6. Garcia Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Gründler K, Visser H, Hirsch E. Effective dosages for recording Veraviewepocs dental panoramic images: analog film, digital, and panoramic scout for CBCT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008b;106:571-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hallquist A, Hardell L, Degerman A, Wingren G, Boquist L. Medical diagnostic and therapeutic ionizing radiation and the risk for thyroid cancer: a case-control study. Eur J Cancer Prevention 1994;3:259-67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Silva MA. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:268-73. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Horn-Ross PL, Ljung BM, Morrow M. Environmental factors and the risk of salivary gland cancer. Epidemiology 1997;8:414-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. ICRP Publication 103. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. 2007. Annals ICRP: 37. [Google Scholar]
  11. ICRP Publication 60.Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990. Annals ICRP: 21. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lofthag-Hansen S, Thilander-Klang A, Ekestubbe A, Helmrot E, Gröndahl K. Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:72-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Longstreth WT, Dennis LK, McGuire VM, Drangsholt MT, Koepsell TD. Epidemiology of intracranial meningioma. Cancer 1993;72:639-48. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, Marchal G, Sanderink G, Jacobs R. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 2009;71:461-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Loubele M, Jacobs R, Maes F, Schutyser F, Debaveye D, Bogaerts R, Coudyzer W, Vandermeulen D, van Cleynenbreugel J, Marchal G, Suetens P. Radiation dose vs. image quality for low-dose CT protocols of the head for maxillofacial surgery and oral implant planning. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;117:211-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:219-26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:229-34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:1237-43. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:106-14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Memon A, Godward S, Williams D, Siddique I, Al-Saleh K. Dental X-rays and the risk of thyroid cancer: a case-control study. Acta Oncol 2010;49:447-53. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Okano T, Harata Y, Sugihara Y, Sakaino R, Tsuchida R, Iwai K, Seki K, Araki K. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:79-85. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Palomo JM, Rao PS, Hans MG. Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:773-82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, Cockmartin L, Bosmans H, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Horner K. The SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol (in press). [Google Scholar]
  24. Preston-Martin S, White SC. Brain and salivary gland tumors related to prior dental radiography: implications for current practice. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:151-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Qu XM, Li G, Ludlow JB, Zhang ZY, Ma XC. Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:770-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol 2009;82:35-40. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Kaser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:367-78. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Theodorakou C, Walker A, Horner K, Pauwels R, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R. The SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam computed tomography using anthropomorphic phantoms. Br J Radiol (in press). [Google Scholar]
  29. Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayiannic K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT. Eur J Radiol 2005;56:413-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. White SC. Assessment of radiation risk from dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992;21:118-26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wingren G, Hallquist A, Hardell L. Diagnostic X-ray exposure and female papillary thyroid cancer: a pooled analysis of two Swedish studies. Eur J Cancer Prevention 1997;6:550-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Al-Ekrish AA, Ekram M. A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of the dental implant site dimensions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:67-75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Alexiou KE, Stamatakis HC, Tsiklakis K. Evaluation of the severity of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritic changes related to age using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:141-47. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Alkhader M, Kuribayashi A, Ohbayashi N, Nakamura S, Kurabayashi T. Usefulness of cone beam computed tomography in temporomandibular joints with soft tissue pathology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010a;39:343-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Alkhader M, Ohbayashi N, Tetsumura A, Nakamura S, Okochi K, Momin MA, Kurabayashi T. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint and its correlation with cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010b;39:270-76. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Almog DM, Lamar J, Lamar FR, Lamar F. Cone beam computerized tomography-based dental imaging for implant planning and surgical guidance. Part 1: Single implant in the mandibular molar region. J Oral Implantol 2006;32:77-81. [Google Scholar]
  37. Angelopoulos C, Thomas Sl, Hechler S, Parissis N, Hlavacek M. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:2130-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Araki M, Hashimoto K, Kawashima S, Matsumoto K, Akiyama Y. Radiographic features of enostosis determined with limited cone-beam computed tomography in comparison with rotational panoramic radiography. Oral Radiol 2006;22:27-33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Araki M, Kameoka S, Mastumoto N, Komiyama K. Usefulness of cone beam computed tomography for odontogenicmyxoma. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:423-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Aranyarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B, Schulz E, Riggs M, Dus I, Yamada JM, Crigger M. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites. 2: Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:416-24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Özdemir T. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed–based clinical comparative study. J Periodontol 2010;81:43-51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Balasundaram A, Geist JR, Gordon SC, Klasser GD. Radiographic diagnosis of synovial chondromatosis of the temporomandibular joint: a case report. J Can Dent Assoc 2009;75:711-4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Barghan S, Merrill R, Tetradis S. Cone beam computed tomography imaging in the evaluation of the temporomandibular joint. J Calif Dent Assoc 2010;38:33-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Barone A, Covani U, Cornelini R, Gherlone E. Radiographic bone density around immediately loaded oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:610-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Barragan-Adjemian C, Lausten L, Ang DB, Johnson M, Katz J, Bonewald LF. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: model and diagnosis with cone beam computed tomography. Cells Tissues Organs 2009;189:284-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Blake FAS, Blessmann M, Pohlenz P, Heiland M. A new imaging modality for intraoperative evaluation of sinus floor augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:183-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Boeddinghaus R, Whyte A. Current concepts in maxillofacial imaging. Eur J Radiol 2008;66:396-418. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Bousquet F, Joyard M. Surgical navigation for implant placement using transtomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:724-30. 73 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Bremke M, Wiegand S, Sesterhenn AM, Eken M, Bien S, Werner JA. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of nasal bone fractures. Rhinology 2009;47:126-31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Caloss R, Atkins K, Stella JP. Three-dimensional imaging for virtual assessment and treatment simulation in orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2007;19:287-309. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Cevidanes LHS, Bailey LJ, Tucker GR, Styner MA, Mol A, Phillips CL, Proffit WR, Turvey T. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34:369-75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Chen L-C, Lundgren T, Hallstrom H, Cherel F. Comparison of different methods of assessing alveolar ridge dimensions prior to dental implant placement. J Periodontol 2008;79:401-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Closmann JJ, Schmidt BL. The use of cone beam computed tomography as an aid in evaluating and treatment planning for mandibular cancer. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:766-71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Danforth RA, Peck J, Hall P. Cone beam volume tomography: an imaging option for diagnosis of complex mandibular third molar anatomical relationships. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31:847-52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. De Oliveira RCG, Leles CR, Normanha LM, Lindh C, Ribeiro-Rotta RF. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:231-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Drage NA, Sivarajasingam V. The use of cone beam computed tomography in the management of isolated orbital floor fractures. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;47:65-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Edwards SP. Computer-assisted craniomaxillofacial surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2010;22:117-34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Eggers G, Welzel T, Mukhamadiev D, Wortche R, Hassfeld S, Muhling J. X-ray-based volumetric imaging of foreign bodies: a comparison of computed tomography and digital volume tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:1880-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Enciso R, Memon A, Mah J. Three-dimensional visualization of the craniofacial patient: volume segmentation, data integration and animation. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003;6 (Suppl 1):66-71 ; discussion 179-82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Fan L-F, Pan X-G, Pu Y-P, Lai H-C. Diagnostic value of dental implants in the posterior maxilla using cone beam computed tomography. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2008;17:548-51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Farronato G, Garagiola U, Carletti V, Cressoni P, Mercatali L, Farronato D. Change in condylar and mandibular morphology in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: cone beam volumetric imaging. Minerva Stomatol 2010;59:519-34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Flygare L, Ohman A. Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal. Clin Oral Investig 2008;12:291-302. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Fortin T, Bosson JL, Coudert JL, Isidori M. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:886-93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Fortin T, Champleboux G, Bianchi S, Buatois H, Coudert J-L. Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:651-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Friedland B, Donoff B, Dodson TB. The use of 3-dimensional reconstructions to evaluate the anatomic relationship of the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:1678-85. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Fullmer JM, Scarfe WC, Kushner GM, Alpert B, Farman AG. Cone beam computed tomographic findings in refractory chronic suppurative osteomyelitis of the mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;45:364-71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ganz SD. Conventional CT and cone beam CT for improved dental diagnostics and implant planning. Dent Implantol Update 2005;16:89-95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ganz SD. Techniques for the use of CT imaging for the fabrication of surgical guides. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2006;14:75-97. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Ganz SD. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing applications using CT and cone beam CT scanning technology. Dent Clin North Am 2008;52:777-808. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Ganz SD. Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 2010;29:256-8. [Google Scholar]
  71. Garg AK. Dental implant imaging: TeraRecon’s dental 3D cone beam computed tomography system. Dent Implantol Update 2007;18:41-5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Bergé SJ. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:964-71. [Google Scholar]
  73. Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig 2006;10:1-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Guerrero ME, Shahbazian M, ElsienaBekkering G, Nackaerts O, Jacobs R, Horner K. The diagnostic efficacy of cone beam CT for impacted teeth and associated features: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:208-16. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Guttenberg SA. Oral and maxillofacial pathology in three dimensions. Dent Clin North Am 2008:52:843-73. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Harokopakis-Hajishengallis E, Tiwana P. Odontogenic myxoma in the pediatric patient: a literature review and case report. Pediatr Dent 2007;29:409-14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, Gröndahl K, Jacobs R, Lekholm U, Nakielny R, van Steenberghe D, van der Stelt P. EAO guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:566-70. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31:825-33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Heiland M, Schmelzle R, Hebecker A, Schulze D. Intraoperative 3D imaging of the facial skeleton using the SIREMOBIL Iso-C3D. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004a;33:130-2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Heiland M, Schulze D, Blake F, Schmelzle R. Intraoperative imaging of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures using a 3D C-arm system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34:369-75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Heiland M, Schulze D, Rother U, Schmelzle R. Postoperative imaging of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures using digital volume tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004b;62:1387-91. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Hendrikx AW, Maal T, Dieleman F, Van Cann EM, Merkx MA. Cone-beam CT in the assessment of mandibular invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma: results of the preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;39:436-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Heurich T, Ziegler C, Steveling H, Wortche R, Muhling J, Hassfeld S. Digital volume tomography--an extension to the diagnostic procedures available for application before surgical removal of third molars. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2002;6:427-32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Hilgers ML, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005;128:803-11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  85. Hintze H, Wiese M, Wenzel A. Cone beam CT and conventional tomography for the detection of morphogical temporomandibular joint changes. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:192-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Hoffman GR, Islam S. The difficult Le Fort I osteotomy and downfracture: a review with consideration given to an atypical maxillary morphology. J Plas Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:1029-33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  87. Honda K, Bjornland T. Image-guided puncture technique for the superior temporomandibular joint space: value of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102:281-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Honda K, Larheim TA, Maruhashi K, Matsumoto K, Iwai K. Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:152-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Honda K, Matumoto K, Kashima M, Takano Y, Kawashima S, Arai Y. Single air contrast arthrography for temporomandibular joint disorder using limited cone beam computed tomography for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:271-3. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Honey OB, Scarfe WC, Hilgers MJ, Klueber K, Silveira AM, Haskell BS, Farman AG. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007;132:429-38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  91. Huntjens E, Kiss G, Wouters C, Carels C. Condylar asymmetry in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:545-51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Hussain AM, Packota G, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Role of different imaging modalities in assessment of temporomandibular joint erosions and osteophytes: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:63-71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Ikeda K, Kawaramura A. Assessment of optimal condylar position with limited cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009;135:495-501. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  94. Kamel SG, Kau CH, Wong ME, Kennedy JW, English JD. The role of cone beam CT in the evaluation and management of a family with Gardner's syndrome. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2009;37:461-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Kijima N, Honda K, Kuroki Y, Sakabe J, Ejima K, Nakajima I. Relationship between patient characteristics, mandibular head morphology and thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa in symptomatic temporomandibular joints. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007;36:277-81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Krisjane Z, Urtane I, Krumina G, Bieza A, Zepa K, Rogovska I. Condylar and mandibular morphological criteria in the 2D and 3D MSCT imaging for patients with Class II division 1 subdivision malocclusion. Stomatologija 2007;9:67-71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Kumar V, Pass B, Guttenberg SA, Ludlow J, Emery RW, Tyndall DA, Padilla RJ. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: a report of three cases demonstrating variability in outcomes and morbidity. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:602-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Lagravère MO, Carey J, Ben-Zvi M, Packota GV, Major PW. Effect of object location on the density measurement and Hounsfield conversion in a NewTom 3G cone beam computed tomography unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:305-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Lagravère MO, Fang Y, Carey J, Toogood RW, Packota GV, Major PW. Density conversion factor determined using a cone-beam computed tomography unit NewTom QE-DVT 9000. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:407-9. 76 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Lee S, Gantes B, Riggs M, Crigger M. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites. 3: Bone quality evaluation during osteotomy and implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:208-12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Lewis EL, Dolwick MF, Abramowicz S, Reeder SL. Contemporary imaging of the temporomandibular joint. Dent Clin North Am 2008;52:875-90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Lloyd TE, Drage NA, Cronin AJ. The role of cone beam computed tomography in the management of unfavourable fractures following sagittal split mandibular osteotomy. J Orthod 2011;38:48-54. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Lou L, Lagravère MO, Compton S, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:402-11. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Loubele M, Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. Comparison of jaw dimensional and quality assessments of bone characteristics with cone-beam CT, spiral tomography, and multi-slice spiral CT. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:446-54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Lübbers HT, Matthews F, Damerau G, Kruse AL, Obwegeser JA, Grätz KW, Eyrich GK. Anatomy of impacted lower third molars evaluated by computerized tomography: is there an indication for 3-dimensional imaging? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010 Oct 15. [Epub ahead of print]. [Google Scholar]
  106. Mah P, Reeves TE, McDavid WD. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010;39:323-35. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Makris N, Stamatakis H, Syriopoulos K, Tsiklakis K, van der Stelt PF. Evaluation of the visibility and the course of the mandibular incisive canal and the lingual foramen using cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:766-71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Marques AP, Perrella A, Arita ES, Pereira MF, Cavalcanti MG. Assessment of simulated mandibular condyle bone lesions by cone beam computed tomography. Braz Oral Res 2010;24:467-74. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Meng J-H, Zhang W-L, Liu D-G, Zhao Y-P, Ma X-C. Diagnostic evaluation of the temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis using cone beam computed tomography compared with conventional radiographic technology. Beijing da Xue Xue Bao 2007;39:26-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Mengel R, Kruse B, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles. J Periodontol 2006;77:1234-41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Metzger MC, Hohlweg-Majert B, Schwarz U, Teschner M, Hammer B, Schmelzeisen R. Manufacturing splints for orthognathic surgery using a three-dimensional printer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:e1-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Momin MA, Okochi K, Watanabe H, Imaizumi A, Omura K, Amagasa T, Okada N, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam CT in the assessment of mandibular invasion of lower gingival carcinoma: comparison with conventional panoramic radiography. Eur J Radiol 2009;72:75-81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Moore WS. Cone beam CT: a new tool for esthetic implant planning. Texas Dent J 2005;122:334-40. [Google Scholar]
  114. Nackaerts O, Maes F, Yan H, Couto Souza P, Pauwels R, Jacobs R. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011 Jan 18. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02076.x. [Epub ahead of print]. [Google Scholar]
  115. Naitoh M, Nakahara K, Suenaga Y, Gotoh K, Kondo S, Ariji E. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:e25-31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Nakagawa Y, Ishii H, Nomura Y, Watanabe NY, Hoshiba D, Kobayashi K, Ishibashi K. Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:1303-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Nakagawa Y, Kobayashi K, Ishii H, Mishima A, Ishii H, Asada K, Ishibashi K. Preoperative application of limited cone beam computerized tomography as an assessment tool before minor oral surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:322-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Nakayama K, Nonoyama M, Takaki Y, Kagawa T, Yuasa K, Izumi K, Ozeki S, Ikebe T. Assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and inferior alveolar nerve with dental 3-dimensional computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2587-91. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Neugebauer J, Shirani R, Mischkowski RA, Ritter L, Scheer M, Keeve E, Zoller JE. Comparison of cone-beam volumetric imaging and combined plain radiographs for localization of the mandibular canal before removal of impacted lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:633-42; discussion 643. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Nickenig H-J, Eitner S. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007;35:207-11. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Nickenig H-J, Eitner S. An alternative method to match planned and achieved positions of implants after virtual planning using cone-beam CT data and surgical guide templates. A method reducing patient radiation exposure (part 1). Craniomaxillofac Surg 2010;38:436-40. [Google Scholar]
  122. Nomura Y, Watanabe H, Honda E, Kurabayashi T. Reliability of voxel values from cone-beam computed tomography for dental use in evaluating bone mineral density. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:558-62. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Peck JN, Conte GJ. Radiologic techniques using CBCT and 3-D treatment planning for implant placement. J Calif Dent Assoc 2008;36:287-90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Petersson A. What you can and cannot see in TMJ imaging – an overview related to the RDC/TMD diagnostic system. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:771-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Pires CA, Bissada NF, Becker JJ, Kanawati A, Landers MA. Mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009 Aug 6. [Epub ahead of print]. [Google Scholar]
  126. Pohlenz P, Blessmann M, Blake F, Gbara A, Schmelzle R, Heiland M. Major mandibular surgical procedures as an indication for intraoperative imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:324-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Pohlenz P, Blessmann M, Blake F, Heinrich S, Schmelzle R, Heiland M. Clinical indications and perspectives for intraoperative cone-beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:412-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Popat H, Richmond S, Drage NA. New developments in: three-dimensional planning for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod 2010;37:62-71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Quereshy FA, Savell TA, Palomo JM. Applications of cone beam computed tomography in the practice of oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008:66:791-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Razavi T, Palmer RM, Davies J, Wilson R, Palmer PJ. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Impl Res 2010;21:718-25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  131. Rodrigues CD, Estrela C. Traumatic bone cyst suggestive of large apical periodontitis. J Endod 2008;34:484-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;28:20-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Rosenberg PA, Frisbie J, Lee J, Lee K, Frommer H, Kottal S, Phelan J, Lin L, Fisch G. Evaluation of pathologists (histopathology) and radiologists (cone beam computed tomography) differentiating radicular cysts from granulomas. J Endod 2010;36:423-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Rozylo-Kalinowska I, Rozylo TK. Imaging diagnostic approach to tumours of ramus and angle of the mandible. Annales UniversitatisMariae Curie-Sklodowska – Sectio d – Medicina 2001;56:103-10. [Google Scholar]
  135. Sakabe R, Sakabe J, Kuroki Y, Nakajima I, Kijima N, Honda K. Evaluation of temporomandibular disorders in children using limited cone-beam computed tomography: a case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2006;31:14-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:571-7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Sato S, Arai Y, Shinoda K, Ito K. Clinical application of a new cone-beam computerized tomography system to assess multiple two-dimensional images for the preoperative treatment planning of maxillary implants: case reports. Quintessence Int 2004;35:525-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Scarfe WC. Imaging of maxillofacial trauma: evolutions and emerging revolutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100:S75-96. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Scherer P, Mischkowski RA, Seifert H, Ortmann M, Neugebauer J, Scheer M, Zoller JE. Solitary hydatid cyst in the mandible: case report and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:1731-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Schoen R, Fakler O, Metzger MC, Weyer N, Scmelzeisen R. Preliminary functional results of endoscope-assisted transoral treatment of displaced bilateral condylar mandible fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:111-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Schulze D. Radiographic diagnostics: keratocyst of the left mandible. Quintessence Int 2009;40:86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Schulze D, Blessmann M, Pohlenz P, Wagner KW, Heiland M. Diagnostic criteria for the detection of mandibular osteomyelitis using cone-beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:232-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Shintaku WH, Venturin JS, Azevedo B, Noujeim M. Applications of cone-beam computed tomography in fractures of the maxillofacial complex. Dent Traumatol 2009;25:358-66. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Simon JHS, Enciso R, Malfaz J-M, Roges R, Bailey-Perry M, Patel A. Differential diagnosis of large periapical lesions using cone-beam computed tomography measurements and biopsy. J Endod 2006;32:833-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Sirin Y, Guven K, Horasan S, Sencan S. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and conventional multislice spiral tomography in sheep mandibular condyle fractures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010;39:336-42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Smith MH, Brooks SL, Eldevik OP, Helman JI. Anterior mandibular lingual salivary gland defect: a report of a case diagnosed with cone-beam computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:e71-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Song YD, Jun SH, Kwon JJ. Correlation between bone quality evaluated by cone-beam computerized tomography and implant primary stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:59-64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Stuehmer C, Essig H, Bormann KH, Majdani O, Gellrich NC, Rucker M. Cone beam CT imaging of airgun injuries to the craniomaxillofacial region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:903-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemi M, Robinson S, Peltola J. Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:10-7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Suomalainen A, Ventä I, Mattila M, Turtola L, Vehmas T, Peltola JS. Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:276-84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Swennen GRJ, Mommaerts MY, Abeloos J, De Clercq C , Lamoral P, Neyt N, Casselman J, Schutyser F. A cone-beam CT based technique to augment the 3D virtual skull model with a detailed dental surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:48-57. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Tantanapornkul W, Okochi K, Bhakdinaronk A, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T. Correlation of darkening of impacted mandibular third molar root on digital panoramic images with cone beam computed tomography findings. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:11-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:253-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Tsiklakis K, Syriopoulos K, Stamatakis HC. Radiographic examination of the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:196-201. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Uchida Y, Noguchi N, Goto M, Yamashita Y, Hanihara T, Takamori H, Sato I, Kawai T, Yosue T. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: a second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:744-50. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, Hirsch E, Schutyser F, Quirynen M, Jacobs R. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:816-21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Jacobs R. Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:398-403. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. van Steenberghe D, Malevez C, van Cleynenbreugel J, BouSerhal C, Dhoore E, Schutyser F, Suetens P, Jacobs R. Accuracy of drilling guides for transfer from three-dimensional CT-based planning to placement of zygoma implants in human cadavers. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:131-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Yamada T, Ishihama K, Yasuda K, Hasumi-Nakayama Y, Ito K, Yamaoka M, Furusawa K. Inferior alveolar nerve canal and branches detected with dental cone beam computed tomography in lower third molar region. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011 Jan 20. [Epub ahead of print]. [Google Scholar]
  160. Zhao Y-P, Ma X-C, Fu K-Y, Song X-X. Temporomandibular joint disc displacement: diagnosis by arthrography with dental volumetric computerized tomography. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2003;38:321-3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:126-30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Zizelmann C, Gellrich NC, Metzger MC, Schoen R, Schmelzeisen R, Schramm A. Computer-assisted reconstruction of orbital floor based on cone beam tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;45:79-80. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.