EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 16 / No 1 (janvier 2010) Med Buccale Chir Buccale, 16 1 (2010) 23-43 References
Open Access
Issue
Med Buccale Chir Buccale
Volume 16, Number 1, janvier 2010
Page(s) 23 - 43
Section Articles originaux
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2009039
Published online 22 February 2010
  1. Lang NP, Wilson TG,Corbet EF. Biological complications with dental implants: their prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11 Suppl 1:146-55. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses (pp 129-43). Quintessence, Chicago, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  3. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI, Lindhe J, Eriksson B, Sbordone L. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 1986;15:39-52 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alberktsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. De Smet E, Jacobs R, Gijbels F, Naert I. The accuracy and reliability of radiographic methods for the assessment of marginal bone level around oral implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:176-81 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:33-40 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titaniumimplants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodentol 2000;71:1412-24 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Nummikoski PV, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a methodological study comparing linear radiographic with histometric measurements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:475-85 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran DL. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2001;72:1372-83 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hermann JS, Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Buser D. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:1117-30 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontal 2002;29 Suppl 3:197-212. 232-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brägger U, Hugel-Pisoni C, Burgin W, Buser D, Correlations between radiographic, clinical mobility parameters after loading of oral implants with fixed partial dentures. A 2-year longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implant Res 1996;7:230-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zechner W, Trinkl N, Watzak G, Busenlechner D, Tepper G, Haas R, Watzek G. Radiologic follow-up of peri-implant bone loss around machine-surfaced and rough-surfaced interforaminal implants in the mandible functionally loaded for 3 to 7 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:216-21 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zybutz M, Rapoport D, Laurell L, Persson GR. Comparisons of clinical and radiographic measurements of inter-proximal vertical defects before and 1 year after surgical treatments. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27:179-86 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Weber HP, Crohin CC, Fiorellini JP. A 5-year prospective clinical and radiographic study of non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:144-53 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wyatt CC, Zarb GA. Bone level changes proximal to oral implants supporting fixed partial prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:162-8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fransson C, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Berglundh T. Prevalence of subjects with progressive bone loss at implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:440-6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wenntröm J, Palmer R. Consensus report of session 3: clinical trails (pp 255-9). Proceedings of the 3rd European workshop on Periodontolgy. Implant Dentistry. Lang N, Karring T, Lindhe J eds. Quintessence, Berlin, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws: a 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:635-40 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged. ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Snauwaert K, Duyck J, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I. Time dependent failure rate and marginal bone loss of implant supported prostheses: a 15-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Investig 2000;4:13-20 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000 1998;17:63-76 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE Jemt T. A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:329-36 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Grondahl K, Sunden S, Grondahl HG. Inter- and intraobserver variability in radiographic bone level assessment at Brånemark fixtures. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;4:243-50 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee JH, Frias V, Lee KW, Wright RF. Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: a literature review. Prosthet Dent 2005;94:377-81 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hämmerle CH, Brägger U, Burgin W, Lang NP. The effect of subcrestal placement of the polished surface of ITI implants on marginal soft and hard tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:111-9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hartmann GA, Cochran DL. Initial implant position determines the magnitude of crestal bone remodeling. J Periodontol 2004;75:572-7 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Bernard JP, Belser UC, Martinet JP, Borgis SA. Osseointegration of Brånemark fixtures using a single-step operating technique. A preliminary prospective one-year study in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:122-9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pepelassi EA, Diamanti-Kipioti A. Selection of the most accurate method of conventional radiography for the assessment of periodontal osseous destruction. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27:179-86 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Romeo E, Lops D, Amorfini L, Chiapasco M, Ghisolfi M, Vogel G. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of small-diameter (3.3-mm) implants followed for 1-7 years: a longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:139-48 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rosling B, Hollender L, Nyman S, Olsson G. A radiographic method for assessing changes in alveolar bone height following periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol 1975;2:211-7 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zechner W, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Busenlechner D, Tepper G, Watzek G. Rotational panoramic versus intraoral rectangular radiographs for evaluation of peri-implant bone loss in the anterior atrophic mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:873-8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sewerin IP. Errors in radiographic assessment of marginal bone height around osseointegrated implants. Scand J Dent Res 1990;98:428-33 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Benn DK. Limitations of the digital image subtraction technique in assessing alveolar bone crest changes due to misalignment errors during image capture. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1990;19:97-104 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wahl G, Lang H. Deformation at the implant interface to prosthetic superstructure: an interferometric approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:233-8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Spiekermann H, Jansen VK, Richter EJ. A 10-year follow-up study of IMZ and TPS implants in the edentulous mandible using bar-retained overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:231-43 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Jacobs R, Schotte A, Darius P. The reliability of pocket probing around screw-type implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:186-92 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Isidor F. Clinical probing and radiographic assessment in relation to the histologic bone level at oral implants in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:255-64 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ericsson I, Lindhe J. Probing depth at implants teeth. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 1993;20:623-7 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Akesson L, Hakansson J, Rohlin M. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography and pocket probing for the measurement of the marginal bone level. J Clin Periodontol 1992;19:326-32 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lofthag-Hansen S, Lindh C, Petersson A. Radiographic assessment of the marginal bone level after implant treatment: a comparison of periapical and Scanora detailed narrow beam radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:97-103 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Battenberg RH, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van Port RP, Boering G. Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark IMZ or ITI implants. A prospective comparative preliminary study: one-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:374-383 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Fiorellini JP, Buser D, Paquette DW, Williams RC, Haghighi D, Weber HP. A radiographic evaluation of bone healing around submerged and non-submerged dental implants in beagle dogs. J Periodontol 1999;70:248-54 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Heydenrijk K, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Stegenga B. Clinical and radiologic evaluation of 2-stage IMZ implants placed in a single-stage procedure: 2-year results of a prospective comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:424-32 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Karoussis K, Muller S, Salvi G, Heitz-Mayfield L, Brägger ULangN. Association between periodontal and peri-implant conditions ; a 10 year prospective study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004;15:1-7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Meijer HJ, Heijdenrijk K, Raghoebar GM. Mucosal and radiographic aspects during the healing period of implants placed in a one-stage procedure. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:397-402 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mericske-Stern R, Oetterli M, Kiener P Mericske E. A follow-up study of maxillary implants supporting overdentures. clinical and radiographic results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:678-86 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Penarrocha M, Palomar M, Sanchis JM, Guarinos J, Balaguer J. Radiologic study of marginal bone loss around 108 dental implants and its relationship to smoking, implant location, and morphology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:861-78 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Romeo E, Ghisolfi M, Rozza R, Chiapasco M, Lops D. Short (8mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: a 3 to 14 year longitudinal study. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:586-92 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, Belser UC. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region: I Clinical and radiographic results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:699-706 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Von Wowern N. In vivo measurement of bone mineral content of mandibles by dual photon absoptiometry. Scand J Dent Res 1985;93:162-8 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Brägger U, Pasquali L, Kornman KS. Remodeling of interdental alveolar bone after periodontal flap procedures assessed by means of computer-assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA). J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:558-4 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Higginbottom FL Buser D. Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:186-98 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:567-72 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Wennerberg A, Lindhe J. Bone and soft tissue integration to titanium implants with different surface topography: an experimental study in the dog. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:323-33 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Meriscke-Stern R, Venetz E, Fahrlander F, Burgin W. In vivo force measurements on maxillary implants supporting a fixed prosthesis or an overdenture: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:535-47 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Keller W, Brägger U, Mombelli A. Peri-implant microflora of implants with cemented and screw retained suprastructures. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:209-17 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. Association between marginal bone loss around osseointegrated mandibular implants and smoking habits: a 10-year follow-up study. J Dent Res 1997;76:1667-74 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Lum LB. A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol 1991;17:126-31 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Mailath G, Stoiber B, Watzek G, Matejka M. Bone resorption at the entry of osseointegrated implants - a biomechanical phenomenon. Finite element study. Z Stomatol 1989;86:207-16 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Meriscke-Stern R. Force distribution on implants supporting overdentures: the effect of distal bar extensions. A 3-D in vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:142-51 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Miyata T, Kobayashi Y, Araki H, Ohto T Shin K. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. Part 4: a histologic study in monkeys. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:384-90 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Nedir R, Bischof M, Briaux JM, Beyer S, Szmukler-Moncler S Bernard JP. A 7-year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI implants with special emphasis on the use of short implants. Results from a private practice. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:150-7 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I) Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:527-51 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Nedir R, Bischof M, Szmukler-Moncler S, Belser UC, Samson J. Prosthetic complications with dental implants: from an up-to-8-year experience in private practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:919-28 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Scharf DR, Tarnow DP. Success rates of osseointegration for implants placed under sterile versus clean conditions. J Periodontol 1993;64:954-6 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Buser D, von Arx T. Surgical procedures in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11 Suppl 1:83-100. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Hämmerle CH, Ingold HP, Lang NP. Evaluation of clinical and radiographic scoring methods before and after initial periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol 1990;17:255-63 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Arlin ML. Survival and success of sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a retrospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 2007;73:821. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP, Peters FSimpsonJP. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants.Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-53 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded, loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Bornstein MM, Schmid B, Belser UC, Lussi A, Buser D. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted acid-etched surface. 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:631-8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Roccuzzo M, Wilson TG. A prospective study evaluating a protocol for 6 weeks’ loading of SLA implants in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002:13:502–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. DeLuca S Zarb G. The effect of smoking on osseointegrated dental implants. Part II: Peri-implant bone loss. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:560-6 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Gruica B, Wang HY, Lang NP, Buser D. Impact of IL-1 genotype and smoking status on the prognosis of osseointegrated implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:393-400 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Carlsson GE, Lindquist LW, Jemt T. Long-term marginal peri-implant bone loss in edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:295-302 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Ozkan Y, Ozcan M, Akoglu B, Ucankale M, Kulak-Ozkan Y. Three-year treatment outcomes with three brands of implants placed in the posterior maxilla and mandible of partially edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:78-84 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D, Nys L. A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part I: Periodontal aspects. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:655-63 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Carmagnola D, Araujo M, Berglundh T, Albrektsson T, Lindhe J. Bone tissue reaction around implants placed in a compromised jaw. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:629-35 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Brägger U, Hafeli U, Huber B, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Evaluation of postsurgical crestal bone levels adjacent to non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:218-24 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Renouard F, Arnoux JP, Sarment DP. Five-mm-diameter implants without a smooth surface collar: report on 98 consecutive placements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:101-7 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Sennerby L, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:173-80 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Block MS, Delgado A, Fontenot MG. The effect of diameter and length of hydroxylapatite-coated dental implants on ultimate pullout force in dog alveolar bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:174-8 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Bischof M, Nedir R, Abi Najm S, Szmukler-Moncler S, Samson J. A five-year life-table analysis on wide neck ITI implants with prosthetic evaluation and radiographic analysis: results from a private practice. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:512-20 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:120-32 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Penarrocha M, Guarinos J, Sanchis JM, Balaguer J. A retrospective study (1994-1999) of 441 ITI(r) implants in 114 patients followed-up during an average of 2.3 years. Med Oral 2002;7:144-55 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Hanggi MP, Hanggi DC, Schoolfield JD, Meyer J, Cochran DL, Hermann JS. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. Part I: A retrospective radiographic evaluation in humans comparing two non-submerged implant designs with different machined collar lengths. J Periodontol 2005;76:791-802 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Romeo E, Lops D, Margutti E, Ghisolfi M, Chiapasco M, Vogel G. Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: a 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:247-59 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Kiener P, Oetterli M, Mericske E, Mericske-Stern R. Effectiveness of maxillary overdentures supported by implants: maintenance and prosthetic complications. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:133-40 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Oetterli M, Kiener P, Mericske-Stern R. A longitudinal study on mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: the influence of retention mechanism and anatomic-prosthetic variables on peri-implant parameters. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:536-42 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. J Periodontol 2000;71:546-9 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI. Influence of bicortical or monocortical anchorage on maxillary implant stability: a 15-year retrospective study of Brånemark system implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:103-10 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Bernard JP, Szmukler-Moncler S, Pessotto S, Vazquez L, Belser UC. The anchorage of Brånemark ITI implants of different lengths. I. An experimental study in the canine mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:593-600 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Deporter D, Todescan R, Caudry S. Simplifying management of the posterior maxilla using short, porous-surfaced dental implants and simultaneous indirect sinus elevation. Int J Periodont Restorat Dent 2000;20:476-85 [Google Scholar]
  96. Renouard F, Nisand D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7 Suppl 1:104-10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Rokni S, Todescan R, Watson P, Pharoah M, Adegbembo AO, Deporter D. An assessment of crown-to-root ratios with short sintered porous-surfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:69-76 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.