| Issue |
J Oral Med Oral Surg
Volume 32, Number 2, 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | E2 | |
| Number of page(s) | 1 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2026001 | |
| Published online | 19 May 2026 | |
Editorial
Oral surgery and fake news: understanding to better protect
1
Oral Surgery Department, Brest Dental School, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, France
2
Oral Surgery Departement, Hospital Department of Odontology, Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery, BECARE Center, A. Morvan University Hospital - 2 rue Auguste Le Faux- 29609 Brest, France
3
Univ Brest, Inserm, EFS, UMR1078, GGB, Brest, France
* Correspondence: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
3
December
2025
Accepted:
11
December
2025
Welcome to 2026 and to this editorial where we untangle truth from fiction… Because in the field of healthcare, all it takes is a single social media post for a “miracle cure” tested by someone's neighbor's sister's cousin to go more viral than a winter cold. Health has become one of the most sensitive battlegrounds for misinformation, where the speed at which false information spreads (not always intentionally) is impossible to control.
You've all seen or heard of that famous pineapple juice with supposedly miraculous benefits after third molar extraction!
Our information-based society has shifted into an image-driven society, where images are the alpha and omega of fake news. For example, the posting of clinical “before/after” cases on social media—often oversimplified—does not do justice to the complexity of managing implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitations [1].
Added to this are psychological and cognitive factors such as confirmation bias, the Dunning–Kruger effect, the availability heuristic, and Brandolini's law or the “bullshit asymmetry principle”: five minutes to spread nonsense, one hour to debunk it. A high level of education does not necessarily protect against producing or relaying false information, often linked to strong belief tendencies. People simply lack two crucial resources: time and discernment [2].
Why do so many false claims circulate? Because they often offer simple solutions to complex issues. Nuance, critical thinking, and debate no longer have their place. Because they play on emotions, anxiety, and cognitive biases. Because they spread in spaces where anyone can speak without always considering the impact of what they share. Because the Web is aristocratic rather than democratic; Google's algorithms can elevate a fake news to the top of disseminated information [3]!
In the JOMOS journal and within our scientific society, the SFCO, we tackle fake news that spreads much faster than microbes. Our role is to explain, analyze, verify using reliable sources, and provide tools such as fact-checking to dismantle false information. We nurture critical thinking and the processes required to uphold scientific truth.
No, eating garlic does not replace antivirals or antibiotics—but it can certainly compromise a romantic dinner. And yes, an oral surgeon is far more reliable than an influencer lounging by a pool. Here, we treat Fake News: no prescription needed, just common sense!
References
- Dias da Silva MA, Walmsley AD. Fake news and dental education. Br Dent J 2019 226:397–399. [Google Scholar]
- Gary CJ. Fake News in Dentistry: Misinformed Consent. False and misleading information, easily accessible online, is complicating dentists' ethical and legal responsibility to provide their patients with the best possible treatment. N Y State Dent J. 2017 Mar;83:2–3. [Google Scholar]
- Lazer D, Baum M, Benkler Y, et al. The science of fake news. Science. 2018;359:1094–1096. [Google Scholar]
Cite this article as: Boisramé S. 2026. Oral surgery and fake news: understanding to better protect. J Oral Med Oral Surg. 32: E2. https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2026001
© The authors, 2026
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.
