Open Access

Table II

Risk of bias assessment in non-RCT by Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.

Checklist Agrawal 2018 Bande 2013 Mukharjee 2009 Rai 2013 Singh 2023
Is it clear in the study what is the ‘cause’ and what is the ‘effect’ (i.e. there is no confusion about which variable comes first)? Y Y Y Y Y
Were the participants included in any comparisons similar? Y Y Y Y Y
Were the participants included in any comparisons receiving similar treatment/care, other than the exposure or intervention of interest? Y Y Y Y Y
Was there a control group? Y Y Y Y Y
Were there multiple measurements of the outcome both pre and post the intervention/exposure? Y Y Y Y Y
Was follow up complete and if not, were differences between groups in terms of their follow up adequately described and analyzed? Y Y Y Y Y
Were the outcomes of participants included in any comparisons measured in the same way? Y Y Y Y Y
Were outcomes measured in a reliable way? Y Y Y Y Y
Was appropriate statistical analysis used? Y Y Y Y Y
% 100 100 100 100 100
Risk of Bias L L L L L

H: High risk of bias; M: Moderate risk of bias; L: Low risk of bias.

Ref: JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES (Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual: 2014 Edition. The Systematic Review of Prevalence and Incidence Data. Adelaide: The University of Adelaide).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.