Open Access
Table III
Wound healing assessment outcomes in evaluated studies.
Study | Intervention | Method of evaluation | Follow up | Results | Statistical significance | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Test group | Control group | Test group | Control group | ||||
Radhakrishna et al., 2022 [17] | Chitosan dental dressing | Cotton pressure pack | Alveolar clinical healing index (mean±SD) | 1 week | 6.72±0.49 | 5.57±0.92 | p < .001 |
Sáez-Alcaide et al., 2020 [15] | A topical gel composed of chitosan, 0.2% chlorhexidine, allantoin, and dexpanthenol | Placebo gel includes all the commercially available gel components except chitosan, 0.2% chlorhexidine, allantoin, and dexpanthenol. | Madrazo-Jimenez [19] modified scale (Percentage) | 2 days and 7 days | Day 2 (41.7%) Day 7 (97.2%) | Day 2 (0%) Day 7 (22.2%) | Day 2 p <0.001 Day 7 p <0.001 |
Pippi et al., 2016 [18] | HDD | Haemostatic sponge | Healing index score (percentage) | 5 ±1 days after at the moment of suture removal. | 70% | 25% | p = 0.0009 |
Lope- Lopez et al., 2015 [16] | A gel containing chlorhexidine, dexpanthenol, allantoin and chitosan (BP) gel | BC oral rinse | Percentage of cicatrization | 7 days | 64% | 13% | p = 0.0001 |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.