Open Access

Table III

All PEDro scores per item.

  Duz Mehmand Bugrahan et al. (2015) Zanotti Laura et al. (2017) Zahran F.et al. (2015) Wu Chih-Ching et al. (2015) Varun Chopra et al. (2015) Shetty Shishir Ram et al. (2015) Shetty Shishir Ram et al. (2014) Shah Kavan et al. (2018) SeyedmajidiSeyedali et al. (2018) Rajkumar K.et al. (2015) Rajkumar K.et al. (2014) RajaramSuganya et al. (2017) Peisker et al. (2017) Patel Shrikant et MetgudRashmi (2015) PanneerSelvam et Sadaksharam et al. (2015) MichailidouEvangelia et al. (2016) Malhotra Rewa et al. (2016) LohavanichbutrPawadee et al. (2018) Liu Chung-Ji et al. (2019) Ko Hui-Hsin et al. (2018) Kaur, Politis et Jacobs (2016) Kallalli Basavaraj N. et al. (2016) Jou Yu-Jen et al. (2014) Jacob Tharun Varghese et al. (2016) Honarmand Marieh Honarmand et al. (2016) Gonçalves Andréia Souza et al. (2015) Gallo Crescenzio et al. (2016) Dadhich M.et al. (2014) Bu Jingqiu et al. (2015) Bhat Supriya et al. (2017) Aziz Salman et al. (2015) Awasthi Nidhi (2017) Arduino Paolo G.et al. (2015) Arantes L.M.R.B.et al. (2015) Achalli Sonika et al. (2017) Babiuch Karolina et al. (2019)
Q1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1
Q2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q4 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
Q5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q8 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Q9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Q10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Q11 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1
Score 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 6 4 5 4 5 5 6 3 4 4 6 4 5 5 5 6 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 4 5

PEDro score of 36 included studies, allowing their methodological evaluation. Q1 (in italic, because will not be counted) = Eligibility criteriahave been clarified; Q2 = Subjects were randomly assigned to groups; Q3 = the allocation respected a secret assignment; Q4 = the groups were similar at the start of the study with regard to the most important prognostic indicators; Q5 = all subjects were «blind»; Q6 = all therapists who administered treatment were «blind»; Q7 = all reviewers were «blind» for at least one of the essential judgment criteria; Q8 = the measures, for at least one of the essential judgment criteria, were obtained for more than 85% of the subjects initially divided into the groups; Q9 = all subjects for whom results were available received treatment or followed the control intervention according to their distribution or; when this was not the case, the data of at least one of the essential endpoints were “intention to treat” analyzed; Q10 = the results of the intergroup statistical comparisons are indicated for at least one of the essential criteria; Q11 = for at least one of the essential judgment criteria, the study indicates both of the effects and the estimation of their variability.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.