Open Access

Table I

Literature review of reconstruction plates with condyle.

Authors and year Condyle prosthesis/number of cases (%) Radiotherapy (Dose in Gray) Reconstruction by local flap Complication rate Plate movement Plate exposure Plate removal Plate fracture Heterotopic bone formations
Vuillemin et al., 1987 11/62 (17.7%) 29/62 (30–70 Gy) NR 9.7% 0/62 6/62 0/62 0/62 0/62
Lindqvist et al., 1992 23/23 (100%) NR 7/23 LGP 41.6% 10/23 NR 7/23 NR 12/23
Kim et al., 1992 13/41 (31.7%) 5/13 (NR) 5/13 LGP 7.7% 0/13 0/13 1/13 0/13 0/13
Patel and Maisel, 2001 4/4 (100%) 3/4 (NR) 3/4 LGP 50% 2/4 3/4 1/4 0/4 0/4
Carlson E., 2002 16/16 (100%) 0/16 0/16 18.8% 2/16 1/16 0/16 0/16 0/16
Daniel and Browne, 2003 6/6 (100%) 4/6 (NR) 5/6 LSCM 0% 0/6 0/6 0/6 0/6 0/6
Westermark et al., 2006 2/2 (100%) 0/2 0/2 100% 2/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 1/2
Marx et al., 2007 132/132 (100%) 36/132 (NR) 2/132 LSCM 9.8% 1/132 6/132 2/132 0/132 0/132
Huang et al., 2015 12/12 (100%) 7/12 (NR) 9/12 ALT
2/12 ALT + LF
1/12 LP
41.7% 5/12 0/12 2/12 0/12 0/12
Desai and Smit, 2019 9/9 (100%) 0/9 0/9 0% 0/9 0/9 0/9 0/9 0/9

ALT: Anterolateral thigh flap, LF: Fibular flap, LGP: Pectoralis major flap, LSCM: Sterno-cleido-mastoid flap, LP: Pedicled flap, NR: not specified.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.